Page 2 of 48

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 00:11 Thu 07 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
DRT wrote:But I have a confession to make. Tonight I went down to the hotel bar at 10pm and ordered a drink. I then, without thinking it through properly, asked the barman to change the TV channel from the football to the cricket. Perhaps JDAW has a point.
:)

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 02:48 Sat 09 Nov 2013
by LGTrotter
DRT wrote:But I have a confession to make. Tonight I went down to the hotel bar at 10pm and ordered a drink. I then, without thinking it through properly, asked the barman to change the TV channel from the football to the cricket. Perhaps JDAW has a point.
Perhaps, true to your Scottish roots, you were trying to make yourself a bit more miserable.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 00:08 Thu 14 Nov 2013
by LGTrotter
It is cricket on the radio though. Really meaningless dull cricket.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 00:30 Thu 14 Nov 2013
by DRT
LGTrotter wrote:Perhaps, true to your Scottish roots, you were trying to make yourself a bit more miserable.
A few days ago a disillusioned colleague asked me "how do you manage to not be p1$$ed off by what's going on here?". My answer was "I started out as a miserable ****, so everything that happens is better than I expected."

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 00:21 Fri 15 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
I didn't tune in to listen to a couple of Australians nattering away with no atmos except an occasional bit of metal-bashing. Where are the pros?

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 11:26 Sat 16 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
The first time that I saw Sachin play was at Lord's in July 02. He made 16. More memorable about that day was running up St. John's Wood Road looking for charity shops in which to buy alternative clothing for the girl I was going out with at the time, an Irish redhead who was dying of heatstroke and wearing a very heavy pair of jeans. Sometimes I look back and wonder how I got myself into certain situations.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 16:52 Sat 16 Nov 2013
by jdaw1
djewesbury wrote:The first time that I saw Sachin play was at Lord's in July 02. He made 16.
He made 14.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 16:53 Sat 16 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
jdaw1 wrote:
djewesbury wrote:The first time that I saw Sachin play was at Lord's in July 02. He made 16.
He made 14.
Incorrect. The link you posted is to the ODI. This was a Test Match. Is it your factchecker's day off?

EDIT: if you delete, I will.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 16:56 Sat 16 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
Ignore JDAW. Correct link.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 17:36 Sat 16 Nov 2013
by LGTrotter
Taunton didn't see much of him either.

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2011/j ... -tendulkar

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 17:44 Sat 16 Nov 2013
by jdaw1
Sackcloth and ashes. :oops:

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 17:54 Sat 16 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
jdaw1 wrote:Sackcloth and ashes. :oops:
Quite ordinary for mere mortals, but we expect more of you.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 17:55 Sat 16 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
LGTrotter wrote:Taunton didn't see much of him either.

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2011/j ... -tendulkar
I remember that. In fact the little master sometimes had a torrid time of it on English tours.. I don't think I ever saw him score even a 50.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 23:31 Sat 16 Nov 2013
by LGTrotter
I wonder that this part of the thread hasn't been moved on the grounds that it is cricket.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 23:35 Sat 16 Nov 2013
by DRT
LGTrotter wrote:I wonder that this part of the thread hasn't been moved on the grounds that it is cricket.
Very true.

Did anyone watch the England v All Blacks game today. An excellent game of ruggers - full commitment from both teams. Splendid.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 01:08 Sun 17 Nov 2013
by DRT
I find it intriguing that the two references made in this thread in reaction to the ending of the career of the highest-scoring cricketer of all time focussed on the occasions he scored only a few runs. Not in an obviously critical way but, some might think, rather dismissively.

What is it about the British that the rest of the world hates so much?

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 01:13 Sun 17 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
DRT wrote:I find it intriguing that the two references made in this thread in reaction to the ending of the career of the highest-scoring cricketer of all time focussed on the occasions he scored only a few runs. Not in an obviously critical way but, some might think, rather dismissively.

What is it about the British that the rest of the world hates so much?
Not at all. But nor do we think he's a god. As millions of Indians do. We evaluate him unsentimentally as a fine cricketer who sometimes seemed to have a weakness playing in England. That is a significant part of his career. It wasn't just once or twice - he often failed to score here, on his last tour as on many others.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 01:14 Sun 17 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
And his high scoring record needs to be out into the context of his average: Bradman didn't play nearly as many matches as Tendulkar but ended with an average of 99.97.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 01:20 Sun 17 Nov 2013
by DRT
And Englishmen often accuse Scotsmen of having a chip on their shoulder. Interesting.

Are you suggesting that millions of people thinking that one of their sportsmen is god-like when they quite obviously are not is in some way limited to countries outside England?

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 01:31 Sun 17 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
DRT wrote:And Englishmen often accuse Scotsmen of having a chip on their shoulder. Interesting.

Are you suggesting that millions of people thinking that one of their sportsmen is god-like when they quite obviously are not is in some way limited to countries outside England?
Are you suggesting that anyone thinks Wayne Rooney is a god?

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 01:33 Sun 17 Nov 2013
by LGTrotter
1)Daniel is not an Englishman.
2)Sachin is a god.
3)Indians make better English gentlemen than the English ever did.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 01:37 Sun 17 Nov 2013
by DRT
djewesbury wrote:
DRT wrote:And Englishmen often accuse Scotsmen of having a chip on their shoulder. Interesting.

Are you suggesting that millions of people thinking that one of their sportsmen is god-like when they quite obviously are not is in some way limited to countries outside England?
Are you suggesting that anyone thinks Wayne Rooney is a god?
Unfortunately, yes. But not the Beckhamites, or the Bothamites, or the Mooreites. None of those like the Rooneyites and think they are all doomed to hell.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 01:37 Sun 17 Nov 2013
by DRT
LGTrotter wrote:1)Daniel is not an Englishman.
2)Sachin is a god.
3)Indians make better English gentlemen than the English ever did.
One of those is very wrong.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 01:40 Sun 17 Nov 2013
by LGTrotter
DRT wrote:
LGTrotter wrote:1)Daniel is not an Englishman.
2)Sachin is a god.
3)Indians make better English gentlemen than the English ever did.
One of those is very wrong.
Do you think he will ever speak to me again?

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 01:41 Sun 17 Nov 2013
by DRT
LGTrotter wrote:
DRT wrote:
LGTrotter wrote:1)Daniel is not an Englishman.
2)Sachin is a god.
3)Indians make better English gentlemen than the English ever did.
One of those is very wrong.
Do you think he will ever speak to me again?
I wouldn't.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 01:55 Sun 17 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
DRT wrote:
LGTrotter wrote:1)Daniel is not an Englishman.
2)Sachin is a god.
3)Indians make better English gentlemen than the English ever did.
One of those is very wrong.
Fortunately, the bit of me that's not English is, via my mother, Indian. So what he took with one hand, he gave with the other.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 01:57 Sun 17 Nov 2013
by LGTrotter
You're right, I must write and apologise to Sachin.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 02:02 Sun 17 Nov 2013
by DRT
djewesbury wrote:the bit of me that's not English is, via my mother, Indian.
This needs to be tested before we accept it.

I have no reason to doubt that that statement is true other than the fact I know you sometime say things for comedic effect. Fez up. Half Indian? True or false?

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 09:06 Sun 17 Nov 2013
by jdaw1
DRT wrote:Half Indian? True or false?
True of DJ.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 10:09 Sun 17 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
jdaw1 wrote:
DRT wrote:Half Indian? True or false?
True of DJ.
Indeed. In India, I am a god.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 22:54 Sun 17 Nov 2013
by Alex Bridgeman
djewesbury wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
DRT wrote:Half Indian? True or false?
True of DJ.
Indeed. In India, I am a god.
But have you ever scored 16 in England?

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 22:59 Sun 17 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
AHB wrote:
djewesbury wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
DRT wrote:Half Indian? True or false?
True of DJ.
Indeed. In India, I am a god.
But have you ever scored 16 in England?
Yes. I forget my high score but it was above 16. In fact I briefly attended the Alf Gover Cricket School in Wandsworth, around the corner from where my father now lives; I think I went with my school friend Ram Patel. But by secondary school, ours being a rugby school, and my eyesight forbidding me to advance at that game, I never advanced beyond the E team. If you're no good at rugby, after all, it obviously follows that there's no point evaluating your skill in cricket.

Mark Butcher was in the year above me. Don't remember him being much cop at rugby. I could be wrong.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 18:31 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by LGTrotter
Ashes starts tonight. Just saying.

More irritatingly my brother-in-law is going to all five days of the opening test for flumpence (compared to what you would pay over here).

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 18:38 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by benread
Is anyone else debating a late nightcap and a little TMS around midnight tonight?!

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 18:44 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
LGTrotter wrote:Ashes starts tonight. Just saying.

More irritatingly my brother-in-law is going to all five days of the opening test for flumpence (compared to what you would pay over here).
The cheapest Test Match I ever went to: Eng v Pak in Lahore at the Gadaffi Stadium. You could only buy a ticket for all 5 days. It was US$5 or thereabouts. Once I was in, a load of teenagers came to talk to me, to practise their English. Mostly they were all very nice (and their English very good) but one was very politely insistent, in a disturbingly rational manner, on what a good thing al Qaeda were, which was depressing. This was (I think) 2005 or 2006. Then a policeman came over and told them to stop pestering me and asked where I was from and did I like Birmingham, as his brother lived there. Every so often he barked a command at the school kids and one of them ran off to get me an ice cream. England were thrashed. I think Collingwood made a score.
benread wrote:Is anyone else debating a late nightcap and a little TMS around midnight tonight?!
Consider me there.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 21:36 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by Alex Bridgeman
benread wrote:Is anyone else debating a late nightcap and a little TMS around midnight tonight?!
I shall probably do the opposite and go to bed early but aim to wake about 5am to catch the last couple of hours. Is scheduled play 11pm to 7am, UK time?

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 21:38 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by benread
12am to 7 am I think. 40 minutes for lunch and 20 for tea. Start is definitely 12am.

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 21:39 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
benread wrote:12am to 7 am I think. 40 minutes for lunch and 20 for tea. Start is definitely 12am.
+1, just checked Cricinfo.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 21:47 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by Alex Bridgeman
djewesbury wrote:
benread wrote:12am to 7 am I think. 40 minutes for lunch and 20 for tea. Start is definitely 12am.
+1, just checked Cricinfo.
Thanks gents, means I won't start shouting at the radio for a while yet.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 21:49 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by benread
AHB wrote:
djewesbury wrote:
benread wrote:12am to 7 am I think. 40 minutes for lunch and 20 for tea. Start is definitely 12am.
+1, just checked Cricinfo.
Thanks gents, means I won't start shouting at the radio for a while yet.
Time to prepare that nightcap too!

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 23:08 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
.. still no team news...

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 23:12 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by benread
I'm sat with phone, tablet and sky sports news waiting. Twitter feed running too!

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 23:13 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
benread wrote:I'm sat with phone, tablet and sky sports news waiting. Twitter feed running too!

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
You missed one important piece of kit... Your glass...?

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 23:14 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by djewesbury
Aggers says Tremlett and Prior...

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 23:15 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by benread
Got that too! Agger's says Tremlett and Prior both play. (Twitter)

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 23:19 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by DRT
My glass of Malt is by my side. The Foster's is on ice. The barbie is ready to be fired-up.

First novice question: Why does KP play for England and not his native South Africa?

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 23:23 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by benread
KP qualified by virtue of his English mother and residency. A quota system in Cricket South Africa denied him the opportunity there. Didn't he explain when you met last year?!

And he is not alone in English team!

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 23:30 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by LGTrotter
DRT wrote:My glass of Malt is by my side. The Foster's is on ice. The barbie is ready to be fired-up.

First novice question: Why does KP play for England and not his native South Africa?
And you didn't even take the opportunity to refer to it as rounders. C'mon Scotland!

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 23:33 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by DRT
benread wrote:Didn't he explain when you met last year?!
No. He didn't speak. I can only assume that he was star-struck.

Re: It's just not cricket

Posted: 23:35 Wed 20 Nov 2013
by DRT
benread wrote:A quota system in Cricket South Africa denied him the opportunity there.
Does that mean "KP wasn't good enough to qualify for the section of the quota for which he was ethnically eligible."?