Page 11 of 42

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 13:34 Fri 06 Nov 2009
by JacobH
KillerB wrote:Not an apostrophe crime and not grammatically incorrect as savings can be made. Where you are going to put your daylight savings and whether they will accrue interest is another matter.
Fair point. Where you do put yours?

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 19:01 Mon 23 Nov 2009
by KillerB
AHB wrote:The supermarket was Sainsbury, but only the one in Camberley as far as I could tell, and it was about 3-4 years ago - just after Christmas in their wine clearance sale. I also picked up a half bottle of Y'quem '01 for £50 from the same supermarket.
Taken from here.

The crime is that AHB is talking about one of the great wines of the World - Chateau d'Yquem. Oh the shame.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 09:39 Wed 02 Dec 2009
by jdaw1

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 14:46 Thu 07 Jan 2010
by jdaw1
Parliament House Hotel wrote:In a city renowned for it's heritage, the Parliament House Hotel has it's own extensive history.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 16:24 Tue 12 Jan 2010
by jdaw1
Companies House wrote:Articles of Association.

This gives details of the company’s internal management affairs, the running of the company and it’s liability..

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 13:16 Tue 23 Mar 2010
by jdaw1
[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=34163#p34163]Here[/url] AHB wrote:Very impressive and still years from it's peak. 94/199.
Cool scoring system.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 23:21 Fri 26 Mar 2010
by Glenn E.
jdaw1 is not alone.

Bob the Angry Flower

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 11:31 Tue 30 Mar 2010
by Alex Bridgeman
jdaw1 wrote:
[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=34163#p34163]Here[/url] AHB wrote:Very impressive and still years from it's peak. 94/199.
Cool scoring system.
A moderately irritating feature of the iPhone's otherwise excellent spell check on entry capabilities is that it insists on adding an apostrophe between it and s regardless of the context. I can only apologise for having missed this one (and for the fat fingers hitting the 9 instead of the 0).

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 18:55 Thu 22 Jul 2010
by jdaw1
[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=36773#p36773]Here[/url] AHB wrote:otherwise it's main value would be as an unusual curiosity
Presumably an iPhone problem the post was signed ‟Alwx”.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 22:19 Sun 25 Jul 2010
by jdaw1
[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=36452#p36452]Here[/url] Andy Velebil wrote:(Mod's, may be best to split this into it's own topic)

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 22:21 Sun 25 Jul 2010
by jdaw1

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 16:12 Fri 30 Jul 2010
by Alex Bridgeman
Some advice and guidance is required to avoid a potential apostrophe crime. How should "shall not" be contracted?

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 16:48 Fri 30 Jul 2010
by jdaw1
1. Why contract? Is there a good reason? If not, don’t.
2. Anyway, shan’t (ignore Wikipedia’s vocabulary error), as in I shan’t be drinking 1975s.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 22:44 Fri 30 Jul 2010
by Alex Bridgeman
jdaw1 wrote:1. Why contract? Is there a good reason? If not, don’t.
2. Anyway, shan’t (ignore Wikipedia’s vocabulary error), as in I shan’t be drinking 1975s.
1) Reporting speech, the word used was the contraction of shall not.
2) The question arose as PG Wodehouse uses sha'n't - and I can see why; but I presume from your reply that sha'n't is now considered archaic.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 15:26 Wed 27 Oct 2010
by jdaw1

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 16:45 Wed 27 Oct 2010
by DRT
jdaw1 wrote:
I thought there was a rule that members who's first language isn't English would not be prosecuted for apostrophe crimes?

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 16:51 Wed 27 Oct 2010
by jdaw1
In the previous post, which was the wrong place to do it, DRT wrote:I thought there was a rule that members who's first language isn't English

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 17:50 Wed 27 Oct 2010
by Andy Velebil
DRT wrote:I thought there was a rule that members who's first language isn't English would not be prosecuted for apostrophe crimes?
What he said I think :twisted: :lol: :lol:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 22:31 Wed 27 Oct 2010
by jdaw1
[url=http://theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=38303#p38303]Here[/url] DRT wrote:Graham's recently claimed to have Colheita's as far back as the mid to late 1800s

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 22:37 Wed 27 Oct 2010
by DRT
jdaw1 wrote:
[url=http://theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=38303#p38303]Here[/url] DRT wrote:Graham's recently claimed to have Colheita's as far back as the mid to late 1800s
:sad:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 14:20 Thu 28 Oct 2010
by Andy Velebil
Can we include grammer issues here too? :lol:
by jdaw1
Roy, you have form for wanting to look and smell at the just the time that busy folk are fetching and carrying and putting out and generally busy being busy.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 14:29 Thu 28 Oct 2010
by jdaw1
Andy Velebil wrote:grammer
And spelling?

Please, what was my error in the above?

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 14:45 Thu 28 Oct 2010
by Andy Velebil
at the just the time

And i've never said my spelling was very good :lol:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 15:12 Thu 28 Oct 2010
by jdaw1
I failed to see the duplicated ‘the’. Ooops. I think that’s typing rather than grammar, but an error nonetheless.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 20:24 Thu 28 Oct 2010
by JacobH
jdaw1 wrote:
[url=http://theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=38303#p38303]Here[/url] DRT wrote:Graham's recently claimed to have Colheita's as far back as the mid to late 1800s
To quote, verbatim, DRT: I thought there was a rule that members who's first language isn't English would not be prosecuted for apostrophe crimes?

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 20:26 Thu 28 Oct 2010
by jdaw1
JacobH wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
[url=http://theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=38303#p38303]Here[/url] DRT wrote:Graham's recently claimed to have Colheita's as far back as the mid to late 1800s
To quote, verbatim, DRT: I thought there was a rule that members who's first language isn't English would not be prosecuted for apostrophe crimes?
Derek might be claiming a first language of Scots.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 06:17 Fri 29 Oct 2010
by DRT
jdaw1 wrote:
JacobH wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
[url=http://theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=38303#p38303]Here[/url] DRT wrote:Graham's recently claimed to have Colheita's as far back as the mid to late 1800s
To quote, verbatim, DRT: I thought there was a rule that members who's first language isn't English would not be prosecuted for apostrophe crimes?
Derek might be claiming a first language of Scots.
I hereby claim diplomatic immunity from prosecution on the grounds of my non-English heritage.
:D

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 16:41 Fri 29 Oct 2010
by benread
DRT wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
JacobH wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
[url=http://theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=38303#p38303]Here[/url] DRT wrote:Graham's recently claimed to have Colheita's as far back as the mid to late 1800s
To quote, verbatim, DRT: I thought there was a rule that members who's first language isn't English would not be prosecuted for apostrophe crimes?
Derek might be claiming a first language of Scots.
I hereby claim diplomatic immunity from prosecution on the grounds of my non-English heritage.
:D
There were days gone by when such non-English heritage was grounds for prosecution, or indeed persecution!

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 09:34 Mon 22 Nov 2010
by jdaw1
Some might be interested in this article on the Tweet Police. No, not me.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 18:04 Thu 25 Nov 2010
by jdaw1
[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=1241#p1241]Here[/url] DRT wrote:I will be leaving my other bottle for Ross to drink on it's 100th birthday
However, Derek is forgiven for two reasons, which are, in order of increasing importance:
  1. It was on 30th June 2007.
  2. [url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=1288#p1288]Two posts later[/url] DRT wrote:Ok- stop going on about it - we'll have it sometime soon

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 11:26 Sun 19 Dec 2010
by jdaw1
[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=39374#p39374]Here[/url] Cookie wrote:My Niepoort 1942 had Woolfgangs sticker on it but I do not recall this having any adverse effect on the contents of my glass :wink:

Re: Software that makes placemats

Posted: 11:52 Sun 19 Dec 2010
by Deleted_User_1
jdaw1 wrote:
Cookie wrote:My Niepoort 1942 had Woolfgangs sticker on it but I do not recall this having any adverse effect on the contents of my glass :wink:
Would your cool have survived Wolfgang drinking your Ni42? (You’ll be pleased to know that your post made it to Apostrophe crimes.)

I am struggling to see what is wrong with this post and request an appeal.

This appeal moved to AC thread by jdaw1.

Re: Software that makes placemats

Posted: 12:36 Sun 19 Dec 2010
by DRT
Cookie wrote:
Cookie wrote:My Niepoort 1942 had Woolfgangs sticker on it
I am struggling to see what is wrong with this post and request an appeal.
So you had a sticker with multiple Wolfgangs on it rather than a sticker that belonged to Wolfgang on your glass?

Appeal rejected.

Re: Software that makes placemats

Posted: 13:00 Sun 19 Dec 2010
by Deleted_User_1
DRT wrote:
Cookie wrote:
Cookie wrote:My Niepoort 1942 had Woolfgangs sticker on it
I am struggling to see what is wrong with this post and request an appeal.
So you had a sticker with multiple Wolfgangs on it rather than a sticker that belonged to Wolfgang on your glass?

Appeal rejected.
May I now change my plea to 'guilty' and ask for clemency for a first offence?

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 13:28 Sun 19 Dec 2010
by jdaw1
  • Then the Snark pronounced sentence, the Judge being quite
    Too nervous to utter a word:
    When it rose to its feet, there was silence like night,
    And the fall of a pin might be heard.

    ‟Transportation for life” was the sentence it gave,
    ‟And then to be fined forty pound.”
    The Jury all cheered, though the Judge said he feared
    That the phrase was not legally sound.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 16:58 Wed 29 Dec 2010
by jdaw1
The BBC (oh the shame of it!), in an article entitled [url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12088561]Russia's Medvedev fires space chiefs over satellites[/url], wrote:Russia's President Dmitry Medvedev has fired two top space officials and reprimanded it's space agency chief.
Edit: I (and perhaps many others) contacted the BBC, including a link to this thread, and something has happened:
The BBC (oh the shame of it!), in an article entitled [url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12088561]Russia's Medvedev fires space chiefs over satellites[/url], wrote:Russia's President Dmitry Medvedev has fired two top space officials and reprimanded the space agency chief.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 00:02 Thu 30 Dec 2010
by Glenn E.
jdaw1 wrote:
The BBC (oh the shame of it!), in an article entitled [url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12088561]Russia's Medvedev fires space chiefs over satellites[/url], wrote:Russia's President Dmitry Medvedev has fired two top space officials and reprimanded it's space agency chief.
Edit: I (and perhaps many others) contacted the BBC, including a link to this thread, and something has happened:
The BBC (oh the shame of it!), in an article entitled [url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12088561]Russia's Medvedev fires space chiefs over satellites[/url], wrote:Russia's President Dmitry Medvedev has fired two top space officials and reprimanded the space agency chief.
Because deleting the offending apostrophe would have been too difficult?

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 08:59 Thu 30 Dec 2010
by jdaw1
I prefer the definite article. There was a light ambiguity about whether the chief belonged to the President, to Russia, or, more plausibly, to Putin.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 21:26 Thu 30 Dec 2010
by Glenn E.
jdaw1 wrote:I prefer the definite article. There was a light ambiguity about whether the chief belonged to the President, to Russia, or, more plausibly, to Putin.
Ah yes, now that you have mentioned it I can see that. However there is now a slight abiguity as to which space agency's chief has been fired. Russia's? Or since this was a BBC article, perhaps Great Britain's?

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 21:36 Thu 30 Dec 2010
by jdaw1
Glenn E. wrote:However there is now a slight abiguity as to which space agency's chief has been fired. Russia's? Or since this was a BBC article, perhaps Great Britain's?
No. No ‟abiguity” at all.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 00:03 Fri 31 Dec 2010
by Glenn E.
jdaw1 wrote:
Glenn E. wrote:However there is now a slight abiguity as to which space agency's chief has been fired. Russia's? Or since this was a BBC article, perhaps Great Britain's?
No. No ‟abiguity” at all.
Arrgh. My keyboard is failing, forcing me to type very carefully and edit everything I type. Poorly, in this case.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 00:15 Fri 31 Dec 2010
by jdaw1
Those commenting in this thread, more than any other, should do so carefully.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 00:48 Tue 18 Jan 2011
by jdaw1

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 14:45 Tue 25 Jan 2011
by jdaw1
[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=40291#p40291]Here[/url] Cookie wrote:Unfortunately Shaun (SAW) will not be able to attend as he forgot that the 26th was his wifes' birthday...good job he remembered at all I say

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 14:47 Tue 25 Jan 2011
by JacobH
You are assuming that this is an apostrophe crime rather than a misspelling crime... :wink:

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 15:02 Tue 25 Jan 2011
by jdaw1
  • Apostrophe Crime; or
  • Mis-spelling, and failure to pluralise, and the unwise coincidence of their birthdays being the same.
Which is more likely?

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 16:53 Tue 25 Jan 2011
by JacobH
jdaw1 wrote:Mis-spelling, and failure to pluralise, and the unwise coincidence of their birthdays being the same.
I do not see the failure to pluralise. I would say ‟A and B’s birthday is tomorrow; they are twins” not ‟A and B’s birthdays are tomorrow...”. And, as is well known, the coincidence of two or people sharing the same birthday is more regular than is often expected. I concede the wisdom point, though.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 17:38 Tue 25 Jan 2011
by jdaw1
Not sure I agree: ‟His wives’ birthdays”, or ‟His wives’ birthday”. Methinks the former more natural: they have one each. I suspect that ‟His wives’ homes” has a different meaning to ‟His wives’ home”, the latter being cheaper and more friendly.

With ‘only’ two wives, the probability that they share a birthday = 649÷237169 ≈ 1 in 365.44. With 23 wives the probability reaches about 1 in 2. The apostrophe crime is more likely.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 14:54 Sun 20 Feb 2011
by jdaw1
Not an apostrophe crime, but nonetheless, from the logo of Bennetts Fine Wines.

Re: Apostrophe crimes

Posted: 18:04 Sun 20 Feb 2011
by DRT
If not an apostrophe crime why is it here?

{stands back and waits to be made to look an idiot}