One quiz at a time

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 09:54 Sat 17 Jun 2017

flash_uk wrote: ↑08:52 Sat 17 Jun 20171032

Nearest so far.

Post by **flash_uk** » 22:14 Wed 28 Jun 2017

not my guess now…

Glenn E. · Post by **Glenn E.** » 00:17 Thu 29 Jun 2017

Oops, I'd lost track.

1075? Solnosi?

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 04:42 Thu 29 Jun 2017

Glenn E. wrote: ↑00:17 Thu 29 Jun 2017 Oops, I'd lost track.

1075? Solnosi?

You are moving futher away again, Glenn E.
3rd so far.

Glenn E. · Post by **Glenn E.** » 05:05 Thu 29 Jun 2017

990 < 1000 < OldBridgeFjell < 1191
962 is closer than 1191
1032 is closest
1075 is 3rd

So... 1032 then 990 then 1075, which I believe puts it between 1000 and 1032. According to Peakery, there are only 2 possible answers left.

Not my turn.

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 05:28 Thu 29 Jun 2017

Glenn E. wrote: ↑05:05 Thu 29 Jun 2017 990 < 1000 < OldBridgeFjell < 1191
962 is closer than 1191
1032 is closest
1075 is 3rd

So... 1032 then 990 then 1075, which I believe puts it between 1000 and 1032. According to Peakery, there are only 2 possible answers left.

Not my turn.

Peakery seems to be incorrect according to my official local map.

Glenn E. · Post by **Glenn E.** » 16:33 Thu 29 Jun 2017

Oh. Well that makes it harder! Drat.

Still not my turn.

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 19:53 Thu 29 Jun 2017

Glenn, I never heard of Peakery before, so you coming up with the names of mountains made me think you knew this area of Norway.
Now everybody are on the same level.

Post by **Alex Bridgeman** » 13:05 Fri 30 Jun 2017

Let's move this along.

1001

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 13:09 Fri 30 Jun 2017

AHB wrote: ↑13:05 Fri 30 Jun 2017 Let's move this along.

1001

You are 2nd best so far.

Post by **PhilW** » 14:28 Fri 30 Jun 2017

Glenn E. wrote: ↑05:05 Thu 29 Jun 2017 990 < 1000 < OldBridgeFjell < 1191
962 is closer than 1191
1032 is closest
1075 is 3rd

So... 1032 then 990 then 1075, which I believe puts it between 1000 and 1032. According to Peakery, there are only 2 possible answers left.

I believe that can be narrowed further:
1032 then 990 means OldBridgeFjell >= 1012
Therefore, 1012 <= OldBridgeFjell <= 1031

With the addition of

Old Bridge wrote: ↑13:09 Fri 30 Jun 2017
AHB wrote: ↑13:05 Fri 30 Jun 20171001
You are 2nd best so far.

then:
1032 then 1001 means OldBridgeFjell >= 1017
Therefore, 1017 <= OldBridgeFjell <= 1031

1026?

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 14:57 Fri 30 Jun 2017

You are narrowing it down beautifully.

Glenn E. · Post by **Glenn E.** » 15:49 Fri 30 Jun 2017

Since Peakery is apparently sorely lacking, I can only guess with random numbers now.

1024?

Post by **flash_uk** » 15:58 Fri 30 Jun 2017

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 16:24 Fri 30 Jun 2017

Glenn E. wrote: ↑15:49 Fri 30 Jun 2017 Since Peakery is apparently sorely lacking, I can only guess with random numbers now.

1024?

Closest so far.

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 16:25 Fri 30 Jun 2017

flash_uk wrote: ↑15:58 Fri 30 Jun 20171031

2nd so far.

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 16:30 Fri 30 Jun 2017

Hint:
The mountain is named after a woman land owner, who when being told that her land would expand to where she could place the "bordermarkingstone". She, unfortunately for her, took one step too many, but her heirs own to the bottom of the mountain.

Glenn E. · Post by **Glenn E.** » 23:57 Fri 30 Jun 2017

PhilW wrote: ↑14:28 Fri 30 Jun 2017 1026?

This could be an important guess!

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 05:24 Sat 01 Jul 2017

Glenn E. wrote: ↑23:57 Fri 30 Jun 2017
PhilW wrote: ↑14:28 Fri 30 Jun 2017 1026?
This could be an important guess!

And it is 2nd best.

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 05:57 Sat 01 Jul 2017

Glenn E. is closest with 1024m
PhilW is 2nd with 1026m
flash_uk is 3rd with 1031m

Glenn E. · Post by **Glenn E.** » 21:20 Sat 01 Jul 2017

Hmm... that's why I needed to know about Phil's guess! I'd have guessed higher than 1024 without that knowledge.

1020m?

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 06:34 Sun 02 Jul 2017

Glenn E. wrote: ↑21:20 Sat 01 Jul 2017 Hmm... that's why I needed to know about Phil's guess! I'd have guessed higher than 1024 without that knowledge.

1020m?

Equal closest so far.

Glenn E. · Post by **Glenn E.** » 18:18 Sun 02 Jul 2017

Then the answer is at hand. Unfortunately, not my turn.

Post by **PhilW** » 21:14 Sun 02 Jul 2017

1022?

All yours Glenn

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 21:38 Sun 02 Jul 2017

PhilW wrote: ↑21:14 Sun 02 Jul 2017 1022? All yours Glenn

Hægefjell 1022m is the correct answer.
PhilW, or Glenn takes the next.

Glenn E. · Post by **Glenn E.** » 00:05 Mon 03 Jul 2017

I have a question, but need to prepare for it. You're going to get a picture as a clue! I'll post tomorrow afternoon if Phil hasn't already posted a question by then.

Glenn E. · Post by **Glenn E.** » 22:57 Mon 03 Jul 2017

What am I drinking?

: what am I drinking?; 2017-07-03 15.53.38.jpg (246.06 KiB) Viewed 15857 times

Post by **PhilW** » 06:03 Tue 04 Jul 2017

San Leonardo 40yr ?

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 11:57 Tue 04 Jul 2017

Taylor 325th Anniversary Limited Edition Tawny

Glenn E. · Post by **Glenn E.** » 14:16 Tue 04 Jul 2017

Not S. Leonardo, but it is a 40-yr old
Not Taylor 325th Anniversary Edition

It's my last bottle, though more could be acquired.

Post by **PhilW** » 19:42 Tue 04 Jul 2017

I admit that having guessed that, I wasn't sure the colour was quite right for SL - a little too red, perhaps more like a Sandeman 40yr?

Glenn E. · Post by **Glenn E.** » 20:13 Tue 04 Jul 2017

Also not Sandeman, but I like your thinking. Bottled in 2007 and likely purchased in 2009. IIRC there was a buyer's op.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 20:32 Tue 04 Jul 2017

Niepoort Tawny 30 Years Old

Glenn E. · Post by **Glenn E.** » 18:32 Wed 05 Jul 2017

Old Bridge wrote: ↑20:32 Tue 04 Jul 2017 Niepoort Tawny 30 Years Old

Not Niepoort.

Also:

Not S. Leonardo, but it is a 40-yr old

I have toured property owned by this producer.

Post by **flash_uk** » 22:35 Wed 05 Jul 2017

Graham 40yo?

Glenn E. · Post by **Glenn E.** » 00:02 Thu 06 Jul 2017

Not Graham.

I've only visited the property mentioned once, and it was not on one of Roy's tours.

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 05:29 Thu 06 Jul 2017

Quinta do Vallado 40 yo?

Post by **flash_uk** » 10:12 Thu 06 Jul 2017

Dalva?

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 10:50 Thu 06 Jul 2017

Kopke?

Glenn E. · Post by **Glenn E.** » 20:33 Thu 06 Jul 2017

Not Vallado.
Not Dalva.
Not Kopke.

Of the producers guessed so far, I believe that a Niepoort property is closest to the property that I visited, with a Sandeman property in second. I have never toured either the Niepoort property or the Sandeman property.

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 21:49 Fri 07 Jul 2017

Not Vallado.
Not Dalva.
Not Kopke.
And not my turn.

Glenn E. · Post by **Glenn E.** » 02:59 Mon 10 Jul 2017

The race is on! Will I finish the bottle before TPF can guess what it is?

Luckily for TPF, I did not consume any more of it over the weekend.

Post by **PhilW** » 05:42 Mon 10 Jul 2017

RP40t?

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 06:24 Mon 10 Jul 2017

Taylor's

/2alph · Post by **/2alph** » 10:14 Mon 10 Jul 2017

Noval

Old Bridge · Post by **Old Bridge** » 11:22 Mon 10 Jul 2017

Portal

idj123 · Post by **idj123** » 12:27 Mon 10 Jul 2017

Quevedo 40yr?

Post by **Alex Bridgeman** » 13:47 Mon 10 Jul 2017

Poças

Glenn E. · Post by **Glenn E.** » 16:22 Mon 10 Jul 2017

/2alph wrote: ↑10:14 Mon 10 Jul 2017Noval

Correct!

The first (and only) time I visited Noval in 2008, I didn't even know they made tawnies. I was such a n00b. Not too long after that there was a buying opportunity and I picked up about a case of the 40-yr old. This is my last bottle from that case, and it is showing beautifully for 10 years in bottle!

Glenn E. · Post by **Glenn E.** » 16:25 Mon 10 Jul 2017

By the way, the hints referred to Passadouro and Seixo.