Page 1 of 3
75@40
Posted: 16:00 Wed 26 Aug 2015
by uncle tom
Theme:
Seventy-Five at Forty.
When: 6½pm on Tuesday 15
th December 2015.
Venue: The Red Room,
The Boot & Flogger, 10-20 Redcross Way, London SE1 1TA, tel +44 20 7407 1184
(streetmap.co.uk, bing, maps.google.co.uk).
Attendees:
- EDN;
- MN;
- THRA (Cá, Ck, Cr, Df, D, F, GC, G, Ni, N, SW, T, W);
- JDAW (—);
- IDJ (Taylor and Offley);
- WPS (Quarles Harris);
- MPM;
- CPR (—);
- SH (—);
- SCD;
- AP;
- TC.
Current draft of
the food order.
Wines available from me (but would need logistical help if supplying all…)
- Cálem;
- Cockburn;
- Croft;
- Delaforce;
- Dow;
- Fonseca;
- Gould Campbell;
- Graham;
- Niepoort;
- Noval;
- Smith Woodhouse;
- Taylor;
- Warre.
Current draft of
the placemats (also,
parameters by which made). (
Do not print from this link. A few days before the tasting there will temporarily be a different link, to counteract problems with the caching of old drafts.)

Re: 75@40
Posted: 16:22 Wed 26 Aug 2015
by jdaw1
My opinion of the 1975 has improved. Subject to permission, yes please.
I have none.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 19:31 Wed 26 Aug 2015
by flash_uk
I'd also be keen please, also subject to permission. I think I have one 1975, but will not be back home to check until Tuesday.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 19:40 Wed 26 Aug 2015
by idj123
Count me in for this. Although readily available I tend to shun the 75s and so am only able to offer Taylor and Offley I believe.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 05:49 Thu 27 Aug 2015
by DRT
I am interested subject to work stuff allowing me to fit this in. If I am attending I would have to adopt please.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 06:11 Thu 27 Aug 2015
by WS1
DRT wrote:I am interested subject to work stuff allowing me to fit this in. If I am attending I would have to adopt please.
same here; will try to come and would bring Quarles Harris.
regards
WS1
Re: 75@40
Posted: 06:22 Thu 27 Aug 2015
by djewesbury
Please add me. Must adopt.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 12:56 Thu 27 Aug 2015
by Alex Bridgeman
I'm not sure. That week is a pretty busy week for me workwise, I'm already in the position of not being able to wholly indulge as normal at the Xmas offline as I have had a 3 line whip imposed on me for a meeting on the Friday.
I had better be a reserve and let others take confirmed seats.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 10:21 Fri 28 Aug 2015
by WS1
AHB wrote:I'm not sure. That week is a pretty busy week for me workwise, I'm already in the position of not being able to wholly indulge as normal at the Xmas offline as I have had a 3 line whip imposed on me for a meeting on the Friday.
I had better be a reserve and let others take confirmed seats.
Hmm; you know that after a tasting is before the next tasting....
It will be a very hard week; I am sure you remember the saying: "whatever does not kill us makes us stronger...."
In my eyes you should join and do not give this a miss; in order to avoid wasting port I am thinking of sharing my seat with a friend. And for God's sake it will be very close to Christmas overall.
So get on with it and join us
means
WS1
Re: 75@40
Posted: 10:27 Fri 28 Aug 2015
by jdaw1
WS1 wrote:in order to avoid wasting port I am thinking of sharing my seat with a friend.
Please don’t let our friendly not-for-profit definitely-for-fun tastings become professional tastings in which people pay $50 for a second person with shared pours. Please, let’s not go in the direction of 28 people squeezed into the Red Room. Ick! If that day you’re not thirsty, just pour a little less. If you are thirsty and have cleared your glasses, then drink and enjoy what remains in the bottles.
Others might disagree. If there is much discussion it might be move to a separate thread.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 10:28 Fri 28 Aug 2015
by jdaw1
WS1 wrote:So get on with it and join us
Wolfgang’s instruction to Alex is entirely sensible.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 10:36 Fri 28 Aug 2015
by WS1
jdaw1 wrote:WS1 wrote:in order to avoid wasting port I am thinking of sharing my seat with a friend.
Please don’t let our friendly not-for-profit definitely-for-fun tastings become professional tastings in which people pay $50 for a second person with shared pours. Please, let’s not go in the direction of 28 people squeezed into the Red Room. Ick! If that day you’re not thirsty, just pour a little less. If you are thirsty and have cleared your glasses, then drink and enjoy what remains in the bottles.
Others might disagree. If there is much discussion it might be move to a separate thread.
I had still the hope that this tasting will be filling up completly and we do prepours in order to have a proper asessment of the 75s; hence my suggestion. If we are just do a best of 75s and we do pouring as needed I take up your suggestion. I am very interesting to see how the 75s are holding up. I feel they passed their dull phase.
regards
WS1
Re: 75@40
Posted: 10:41 Fri 28 Aug 2015
by DRT
jdaw1 wrote:WS1 wrote:in order to avoid wasting port I am thinking of sharing my seat with a friend.
Please don’t let our friendly not-for-profit definitely-for-fun tastings become professional tastings in which people pay $50 for a second person with shared pours. Please, let’s not go in the direction of 28 people squeezed into the Red Room. Ick! If that day you’re not thirsty, just pour a little less. If you are thirsty and have cleared your glasses, then drink and enjoy what remains in the bottles.
Others might disagree. If there is much discussion it might be move to a separate thread.
I entirely agree.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 11:28 Fri 28 Aug 2015
by WS1
DRT wrote:jdaw1 wrote:WS1 wrote:in order to avoid wasting port I am thinking of sharing my seat with a friend.
Please don’t let our friendly not-for-profit definitely-for-fun tastings become professional tastings in which people pay $50 for a second person with shared pours. Please, let’s not go in the direction of 28 people squeezed into the Red Room. Ick! If that day you’re not thirsty, just pour a little less. If you are thirsty and have cleared your glasses, then drink and enjoy what remains in the bottles.
Others might disagree. If there is much discussion it might be move to a separate thread.
I entirely agree.
am confused now since at the 45 tasting I was sure you were unhappy too much port ending in the buckets. Also I have never done commercial tastings nore intend to or need to. So I am not sure about what my suggestion sharing with a friend causing so much offence with you. If you promise to clear up my remains there is no need me bring a friend...
At the 45 tasting you did not or choose not to clear them.
regards
WS1
Re: 75@40
Posted: 12:11 Fri 28 Aug 2015
by DRT
I'm not offended at all Wolfgang, I am simply agreeing with Julian's view that we don't want our tastings to turn into the sort of event he describes.
The problem at the 1945 tasting was very different as we had far more bottles than could possibly have been drunk by the number of people there and we knew that some of them were likely to be over the hill. That, in my view, was wasteful.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 12:14 Fri 28 Aug 2015
by WS1
So I will rely on Julian and you to drink up my remains...
OK?
regards
WS1
Re: 75@40
Posted: 15:17 Fri 28 Aug 2015
by DRT
I am sure they will be taken care of

Re: 75@40
Posted: 08:04 Sat 29 Aug 2015
by CPR 1
Yes please - I will need to adopt as I have not a single bottle of 75!
Re: 75@40
Posted: 15:45 Sun 30 Aug 2015
by jdaw1
uncle tom wrote:Wines available from me (but would need logistical help if supplying all…)
It seems quite simple: only Tom has many ’75s. Wolfgang has Quarles Harris; Ian has Offley and Taylor; Tom has everything else.
But that is a luggage problem. Tom, should I ask the B&F whether they would store some Port from 9th September (
E2>V) until the 1975 event? That would allow the logistics to be spread over multiple trips to London?
And in the same call I will book the Red Room for Tuesday 15
th December 2015.
Edit: The Red Room at
The Boot & Flogger (+44 20 7407 1184) has been booked for Tuesday 15th December. Normally December bookings need a deposit, but because it is us, not us. I undertook to send promptly any change of date or mind. The B&F’s Tom also said that he was willing to label a shelf in the cellar as being for our use — though presumably it would be prudent to label each bottle carefully as well.
And placemats added to first post. Alphabetical flighting not optimal: please suggest better.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 13:46 Tue 01 Sep 2015
by PhilW
I'm unlikely to be able to make another tasting in London in the same week as the TPF Xmas event, unless by some miracle I suddenly turn out not to busy with work in the fortnight leading up to Xmas; this does not seem likely at the moment.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 07:45 Wed 02 Sep 2015
by uncle tom
Tom, should I ask the B&F whether they would store some Port from 9th September
That's an idea - if I bring a six pack down next week, that would ease the burden in December..
Re: 75@40
Posted: 23:03 Thu 03 Sep 2015
by ProfS
Hi Tom,
If there is still space I would like to come along. Would be flying down from Scotland to attend and new to this. Only recently started a modest VP collection/appreciation and keen to learn. Let me know what the form is (adopt a bottle/ share cost etc?) and whether there is a free space.
Cheers
Steve
Re: 75@40
Posted: 00:09 Fri 04 Sep 2015
by jdaw1
ProfS wrote:If there is still space I would like to come along. Would be flying down from Scotland to attend and new to this. Only recently started a modest VP collection/appreciation and keen to learn. Let me know what the form is (adopt a bottle/ share cost etc?) and whether there is a free space.
Hello ProfS. The rule is that “something fair will happen”. As Tom is providing most of the bottles for this event, costs will be shared. On the evening we will split the food bill, which will be £40 or £45 per head (policy is to tip generously, as penance for not paying corkage). Other than that your tasks are to be entertaining, and not to wear perfume.
For the placemats, what are your initials, and are you a leftie?
Re: 75@40
Posted: 06:49 Fri 04 Sep 2015
by ProfS
Sounds good. Initials SH. Not a leftie. Perfume locked away. Brushing up on scintillating chat.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 08:22 Fri 04 Sep 2015
by jdaw1
ProfS wrote:Sounds good. Initials SH. Not a leftie. Perfume locked away. Brushing up on scintillating chat.
That, and some internet rummaging, has convinced me that you are one of us. We look forward to seeing you at this tasting.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 13:12 Tue 22 Sep 2015
by Doggett
If there is room, I would like to come along for the 75@40 tasting in December at the wonderful Boot.
I would need to adopt a bottle for this tasting if there is room for another and someone could kindly help me with a bottle from the vintage? hope to see you there...
Re: 75@40
Posted: 13:20 Tue 22 Sep 2015
by jdaw1
SCD added to first post and to placemats.
As ownership of bottles is concentrated amongst only a few of us (several people having none), it likely that we’ll share costs rather than adopt individual bottles.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 04:56 Wed 23 Sep 2015
by uncle tom
Looking at the bottle line up there is a noticeable gap which seems rather elusive..
Does anyone have a Sandeman '75 in their cellar??
Re: 75@40
Posted: 07:51 Wed 23 Sep 2015
by Doggett
Hi Tom,
If no one has the S75 then I have seen them listed here. It is claimed they are shipped straight from the Sandeman cellars. I would be happy to purchase as my contribution if that would help? I am not sure what the opinion of this supplier is, so any thoughts appreciated.
http://www.vintagewineandport.co.uk/vin ... 1975-wine/
Re: 75@40
Posted: 08:41 Wed 23 Sep 2015
by jdaw1
£90 is over-priced for a 1975.
Have you tried
wine-searcher.com?
Re: 75@40
Posted: 10:53 Wed 23 Sep 2015
by Doggett
thanks for the tip, I have had a look and MWH has a much more reasonable listing of 11 bottles @ £55. will keep researching.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 06:38 Thu 24 Sep 2015
by uncle tom
I looked at wine-searcher initially and didn't see any Sa75, but now see MWH has some at a tolerable price - will contact..
Re: 75@40
Posted: 17:00 Fri 25 Sep 2015
by ProfS
jdaw1 wrote:We look forward to seeing you at this tasting.
Travel booked. See you all on 15th (if not before).
Re: 75@40
Posted: 09:58 Sat 26 Sep 2015
by Axel P
Hi Tom,
please put me on as well.
I would have additionally:
Dow from Magnum
Graham from Magnum
Messias
Quarles Harris
Axel
Re: 75@40
Posted: 20:43 Sun 27 Sep 2015
by forest26
Hi guys
Is there a spare berth at this one?
Let me know if so or one becomes available - I have a few from this year
Incidentally looking at the thread I can donate a mag of Sa 75
Best wishes
Tony
Re: 75@40
Posted: 00:06 Mon 28 Sep 2015
by jdaw1
On Tom’s behalf
AP and
TC added to first post.
Tom: you are being offered magnums. You need to shape this tasting.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 08:52 Mon 28 Sep 2015
by ProfS
jdaw1 wrote:On Tom’s behalf
AP and
TC added to first post.
Tom/jdaw would you be able to add me to the attendee list?
Re: 75@40
Posted: 10:10 Mon 28 Sep 2015
by jdaw1
ProfS wrote:Tom/jdaw would you be able to add me to the attendee list?
My fault—forgot. Now done, and I think in the correct order.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 05:00 Tue 29 Sep 2015
by WS1
Re: 75@40
Posted: 16:41 Tue 29 Sep 2015
by uncle tom
I don't have any magnums of '75 but now they're popping up..
What do people think? Shall we go for mags wherever possible, so we all get several well filled glasses?
Re: 75@40
Posted: 05:41 Wed 30 Sep 2015
by DRT
There is a danger that mags will distort the result of this tasting. I thought the purpose was to determine whether or not 1975 VP has turned a corner and become worth buying. Mags are likely to have evolved in a different way to the standard bottles that are generally available. Do we still have the same objective or has this turned into something else?
Re: 75@40
Posted: 12:05 Thu 01 Oct 2015
by idj123
Personally, I'd be happy to taste a G75 or D75 Mg alongside the standard* format to ascertain the difference in evolution between the two and if we're after the inclusion of S75 and haven't got the standard* format then there seems no harm in including the S75 Mg.
*by 'standard' I of course mean everyone else's standard and not JDAW's!
Re: 75@40
Posted: 12:34 Thu 01 Oct 2015
by jdaw1
idj123 wrote:*by 'standard' I of course mean everyone else's standard and not JDAW's!
My standard 1975 is none at all, which we agree would be wrong at this tasting.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 15:00 Thu 01 Oct 2015
by WS1
jdaw1 wrote:idj123 wrote:*by 'standard' I of course mean everyone else's standard and not JDAW's!
My standard 1975 is none at all, which we agree would be wrong at this tasting.
The most experiences of 1975 port I have is for Cockburns since I had a sixpack. The one I like most so far is Niepoort.
regards
WS1
Re: 75@40
Posted: 18:15 Thu 01 Oct 2015
by DRT
DRT wrote:There is a danger that mags will distort the result of this tasting. I thought the purpose was to determine whether or not 1975 VP has turned a corner and become worth buying. Mags are likely to have evolved in a different way to the standard bottles that are generally available. Do we still have the same objective or has this turned into something else?
Which idiot stole my login and posted this nonsense!!
The more mags the merrier I say!!
Re: 75@40
Posted: 13:01 Thu 08 Oct 2015
by flash_uk
I can supply a Dow '75.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 15:14 Sat 17 Oct 2015
by Axel P
I would like to see the Mags alongside with the regular wine as this would very much again show the difference and tell us how a normal bottle was some 10-15 years ago. My Mags were recently bought directly from the Symington cellar, so fairly good provenance.
@Tom: let me know when and where to send them or to bring them to the 85 horizontal
Axel
Re: 75@40
Posted: 21:17 Sat 17 Oct 2015
by uncle tom
Looking at the volume of port per capita, and not wanting wastage, I'm thinking that with the addition of a QH (bottle) and Sa (Mag) to my original list, the addition of one mag vs bottle comparison would bring us to saturation point, - or would people rather pig out..??
Re: 75@40
Posted: 22:30 Sat 17 Oct 2015
by DRT
uncle tom wrote:Looking at the volume of port per capita, and not wanting wastage, I'm thinking that with the addition of a QH (bottle) and Sa (Mag) to my original list, the addition of one mag vs bottle comparison would bring us to saturation point, - or would people rather pig out..??
It is 1975 - lots of it can be sent to the kitchen if not wanted.
Re: 75@40
Posted: 19:37 Sun 29 Nov 2015
by djewesbury
I am now uncertain as to whether I can attend. I will update soon but it is looking more unlikely than likely.