Page 1 of 1

Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 13:16 Tue 14 Apr 2020
by flash_uk
Who would like to join another virtual tasting on Tuesday 21 April. I’m going to limit slots to 9 people, based on learnings from the first two tastings.

The format will otherwise be the same, although this time, we will combine the verbal delivery of a tasting note, with guesses from the others. This should allow us to cycle quickly through the guesses and spend more time chatting.

When: Tuesday April 21, 7pm London time

People:
  1. MPM
  2. Reserved
  3. Charles
  4. Neil
  5. Simon
  6. Alex
  7. Julian
  8. Tony
  9. Will
The vote-recorder page.
Image

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 13:17 Tue 14 Apr 2020
by CPR 1
yes please

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 13:18 Tue 14 Apr 2020
by nac
Yes please.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 13:21 Tue 14 Apr 2020
by Doggett
Yes please.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 13:28 Tue 14 Apr 2020
by Alex Bridgeman
Yes please

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 13:39 Tue 14 Apr 2020
by jdaw1
Yes please.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 14:08 Tue 14 Apr 2020
by forest26
yes please

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 14:17 Tue 14 Apr 2020
by flash_uk
Cripes. One slot left.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 15:39 Tue 14 Apr 2020
by Will W.
I'm in, if not too late.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 18:47 Tue 14 Apr 2020
by Glenn E.
Gah, looks like I'm the unlucky #10. Well, put me on the wait list if there is one!

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 22:28 Tue 14 Apr 2020
by flash_uk
Glenn E. wrote: 18:47 Tue 14 Apr 2020 Gah, looks like I'm the unlucky #10. Well, put me on the wait list if there is one!
Glenn, I’ll send you the invite anyway, and feel free to drop in with some port. I know you’ll likely not be able to spend the whole time with us as it’s work time for you.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 17:02 Wed 15 Apr 2020
by Glenn E.
flash_uk wrote: 22:28 Tue 14 Apr 2020
Glenn E. wrote: 18:47 Tue 14 Apr 2020 Gah, looks like I'm the unlucky #10. Well, put me on the wait list if there is one!
Glenn, I’ll send you the invite anyway, and feel free to drop in with some port. I know you’ll likely not be able to spend the whole time with us as it’s work time for you.
Awesome, thanks! :CC6633:

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 21:24 Thu 16 Apr 2020
by flash_uk
OK folks, invite sent. Looking forward to it :663300:

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 09:16 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by Alex Bridgeman
Bottle selected and opened at 10.15 today. Will be decanted around 15.00 to be consumed from 19.00.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 09:45 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by Doggett
Bottle opened and decanted at 10pm last night. Stopper put on decanter but will be removed at midday. Seems to be showing very well.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 12:44 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by nac
Bottle decanted at 1300. Initially didn’t show particularly well, so hope it improves by 1900.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 17:00 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by jdaw1
Sorry, slow making the vote-recorder page.
Image

Who can print and be the returning officer?

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 17:12 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by nac
jdaw1 wrote: 17:00 Tue 21 Apr 2020 Who can print and be the returning officer?
Printed. I’ll do it...

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 17:13 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by Doggett
nac wrote: 17:12 Tue 21 Apr 2020
jdaw1 wrote: 17:00 Tue 21 Apr 2020 Who can print and be the returning officer?
Printed. I’ll do it...
Hero!

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 17:36 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by nac
Doggett wrote: 17:13 Tue 21 Apr 2020
nac wrote: 17:12 Tue 21 Apr 2020
jdaw1 wrote: 17:00 Tue 21 Apr 2020 Who can print and be the returning officer?
Printed. I’ll do it...
Hero!
You not fancy doing it again?

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 17:44 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by Glenn E.
Bottle splash decanted at 10:00 am Pacific (6:00 pm GMT), glass immediately poured and awaiting the start.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 17:45 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by nac
Glenn E. wrote: 17:44 Tue 21 Apr 2020 Bottle splash decanted at 10:00 am Pacific (6:00 pm GMT), glass immediately poured and awaiting the start.
Pre-midday drinking - the mark of an enthusiast.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 17:49 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by Glenn E.
nac wrote: 17:45 Tue 21 Apr 2020
Glenn E. wrote: 17:44 Tue 21 Apr 2020 Bottle splash decanted at 10:00 am Pacific (6:00 pm GMT), glass immediately poured and awaiting the start.
Pre-midday drinking - the mark of an enthusiast.
It's after 5 o'clock somwhere! Specifically, in London!

I've also tweaked some WiFi settings so I'm hoping my connection will be a little more stable this time.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 19:17 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by jdaw1
Some dictated notes follow.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 19:17 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by jdaw1
SDC: young enough to be decanted yesterday at 10pm, really thick tannins last night. Over the day — decanter open since lunchtime — very opaque, slight ruby rim, nose ripe fruit, palate sweet entry, but not overripe, strawberries raspberries blackberries, big tannins weighty, good acidity, lovely balance. Will definitely last a generation or two. 91–92 points. Much nicer than expected. Thought it would be closed. Actually very nice.

Actually GM06.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 19:24 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by jdaw1
MPM: 50% opacity nice dark red. Nose very open, lovely rich fruits, not overripe, they are just opening up. Maybe a little black fruit — plums? — rich lovely scent . Nice balance, a little heat mid palate, tannins soft and almost integrated. Fruit most prominent feature of palate, nicely ripe, neither too early nor overripe. Nice sweetness, but not too much.

Actually F85.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 19:34 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by jdaw1
JDAW, decanted 14:00. Dark red. Palate early sweet dark plum, slightly dry mid. Big, rounded and full, lovely. Late palate is long, dry, plums again. Very long, This showing very well. Me like.

Actually M&S 2007 made by David Guimaraens.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 19:43 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by jdaw1
CPR: beautifully 50% opaque glorious red colour. A little rosehip on nose. Palate has integrated tannins, some rosehip, some gentle strawberry, good length.

Actually QH77.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 19:54 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by Glenn E.
GEE:

Opened for the FTLOP April/May Virtual Tasting and also the 3rd Port Forum VT

Color: medium dark garnet, kind of a black cherry color. Some brick.

Nose: semi-tart black cherry, some very faint sour VA, some blackberry and some black currant

Palate: rich, ripe black cherry seems to be the theme here, with some faint prune backing it up. Also some purple bramble flavors like mulberry or huckleberry. Rich and mellow, but also fairly tart. Good body and texture. Some nice chocolate on the back end. Excellent showing.

Finish: good length, with a tart and somewhat pleasantly sour tail.

Score: 93 points. This is a nicer example than usual, but still within the expected range.

Reveal: 1987 Porto Souza Vintage Port

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 20:18 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by jdaw1
TC

It’s a fairly dark tawny colour, looks older than its actual age. On nose a bit spicy, almost smells like rum-and-coke, but with an oxidised edge. On the palate a lot of heat, a lot of spice, some burnt spice, and still that sort-of not-faulty on-edge quality. Some pepper, medium bodied, little tannin, little fruit. The main component of this vintage is from a vineyard between Pinhão and Pesqueira.

Actually: B80.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 20:38 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by jdaw1
AHB2: darker red, younger in appearance, blackish red to appearance. Maybe 95% opaque. Nose has a little bottle stink, sweet bramble underneath. Bottle stink spoils palate on entry; mid-palate dry, bruised. Moderate aftertaste, short finish, which does open up to a bit of green woodiness that does have a good length. Has been open three days. Not very impressed. Has had it before — this is the sixth time — and the bottle stink doesn’t seem to be typical.

Actually FG88.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 20:47 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by jdaw1
WHW: I’d show you the glass but I’ve quaffed the decanter. Largely translucent. The nose is sour cherry, green apple, maybe a bit of linden, not a sweet nose, but lovely, maybe wood or lacquered wood. Palate sweeter than the nose had suggested, some gentle citrus on fore-palate, mid-way through the sweetness starts to come, some strawberry and hint of caramel, and the barest hint of tannins and even a touch of wood. So the tannins are almost fully integrated, longish, warming. Well that’s it. Very much in balance, medium weight, the sweetness a touch on the light side, little to medium finish. really really nice, Stellar, no; 91 points. After four hours in the decanter, beautiful balance; modest acidity, modest sweetness level.

Actually: Taylor 1980.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 21:06 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by jdaw1
NAC: leaves into neck, sore came out easily. 30% opaque, very pale red, not browning, not tawny. Not a great deal not he one, maybe like a 10yo tawny. Dried fruits, figs maybe, apricots and orangey dried fruits. Nose better than when opened. On palate fruit, dried, orange, slight sourness. Not partially sweet. medium-plus length. Conclusion: much improved from when opened, a pleasant drink, maybe a duff bottle. At peak, or just past, Need to try another bottle.

Actually: Sandeman 1977.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 21:13 Tue 21 Apr 2020
by jdaw1
Best guesser was Tony, with four points.

Re: Virtual tasting #3, Tuesday 21 April

Posted: 10:09 Wed 22 Apr 2020
by nac
"What is it?" scores:

Scores Snip.JPG
Scores Snip.JPG (82.42 KiB) Viewed 9281 times

As mentioned, Tony came top with 4 points, but on a "points per guess" basis he was shaded by Glenn (who had to leave early).