NV Quevedo Tawny 10YO (bottled 2007)
Posted: 20:10 Fri 07 Aug 2020
Notes: Bottled in 2007. Curious colour: orange / pink in the centre fading almost to nothing (perhaps a touch of very-old green). Very, very cloudy though. Nose is quite subdued. The aroma is complex but very distant: some spice, fruit and perhaps some dried citrus. In the mouth, immediately quite sweet with the sugar mellowing into a toffee-like aftertaste which lasts very long time. Good acidity. Very little fruit. A touch astringent on immediate tasting but it then fades. Not really like any other ten-year-old tawny: it reminds me of a non-commercial colheita or similar rarities. Although it is a long time since I last tried it, I don’t think it has been damaged by bottle-aging and perhaps has improved. Would be interesting to see if their current offering is a little more “commercial” in style.
Date: 7th August 2020
Rated*: P
http://www.jacob-head.com/port/records/ ... -Old-Tawny
* A Note on Ratings
My rating system attempts to answer the question “is this a good Port?” one of three ways: N—No; P—Possibly; or C—Certainly. Ports generally are rated against others of their category. Therefore, a Ruby Port which I rate as C for Certainly good, might not be as good as a Vintage Port which receives the same rating. I sometimes modify my rating with a plus or minus indicating that the Port is better or worse than might be expected for this category.
Date: 7th August 2020
Rated*: P
http://www.jacob-head.com/port/records/ ... -Old-Tawny
* A Note on Ratings
My rating system attempts to answer the question “is this a good Port?” one of three ways: N—No; P—Possibly; or C—Certainly. Ports generally are rated against others of their category. Therefore, a Ruby Port which I rate as C for Certainly good, might not be as good as a Vintage Port which receives the same rating. I sometimes modify my rating with a plus or minus indicating that the Port is better or worse than might be expected for this category.