1992 Burmester

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
winesecretary
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1907
Joined: 15:35 Mon 13 May 2019

1992 Burmester

Post by winesecretary »

Pale and not bright. Odd sweet nose - almost as if chaptalised? Candy palate. Hot finish. Not very good.

Consumed 6/4/22.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14912
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1992 Burmester

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

A little sediment in the wine, mature; 90% opaque. Soft bruised fruit on the nose; floral with cornflower perfume. Sweet honey and rose hips on the palate; good acidity and with gentle tannins on the palate. The wine delivers a nice liveliness on the late palate. A flash of acidity on the aftertaste. Warm, redcurrant finish. Pleasant. 87/100. Tasted 06-Apr-22. Decanted 10½ hours.
Top Ports in 2023: Taylor 1896 Colheita, b. 2021. A perfect Port.

2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
Constandia
Taylor’s LBV
Posts: 170
Joined: 10:07 Sun 27 Apr 2014

Re: 1992 Burmester

Post by Constandia »

A little cloudy, perhaps some powdery sediment dispersed in the wine. Aromas of coca cola, star anise, candy. Quite sweet on the palate with the alcohol standing out creating a little imbalance. The finish was medium+ though which is a positive trait. An OK port, just good without too much complexity going on. 87/100. Tasted 06-Apr-22.
User avatar
flash_uk
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4096
Joined: 20:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: 1992 Burmester

Post by flash_uk »

35% opacity, cloudy dull brick red. Sweet strawberries and candy on the nose. Simple and sweet - chewy ripe strawberries.
Post Reply