Page 1 of 2
A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 13:41 Sat 28 Feb 2009
by Alex Bridgeman
Posted here as this is
NOT a serious tasting suggestion.
Here JacobH wrote:AHB wrote:!we simply decided that the tasting was already so large and expensive!we would prefer to call upon Jay's generosity at another time - perhaps in a Taylor & Vargellas complete 20th Century Vertical.
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Excluding unofficial bottlings, I make that 60 bottles!
Why would we want to exclude unofficial bottlings? Do you have something against the Taylor 1948 or Taylor 1950 Special Quinta bottlings or the Vargellas 1970 bottling?
Alex
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 15:10 Sat 28 Feb 2009
by JacobH
AHB wrote:Posted here as this is
NOT a serious tasting suggestion.
Here JacobH wrote:AHB wrote:!we simply decided that the tasting was already so large and expensive!we would prefer to call upon Jay's generosity at another time - perhaps in a Taylor & Vargellas complete 20th Century Vertical.
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Excluding unofficial bottlings, I make that 60 bottles!
Why would we want to exclude unofficial bottlings? Do you have something against the Taylor 1948 or Taylor 1950 Special Quinta bottlings or the Vargellas 1970 bottling?
Alex
But how would we know when we had sourced every unofficial bottle--a necessity to make it ‟complete”? And why stop at 1900? Shouldn’t a vertical of this nature start with the Waterloo vintage?
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 15:13 Sat 28 Feb 2009
by jdaw1
My UK stocks include 1912 1924 1927 1948 1955 1963 1970 1977 1980 1985 and, though it probably wouldn’t be needed, 1985 in magnum.
This isn’t a serious suggestion for a one-day tasting, of course. We’d need a long weekend.
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 15:23 Sat 28 Feb 2009
by JacobH
jdaw1 wrote:though it probably wouldn’t be needed, 1985 in magnum.
A legitimate add-on to this tasting would be magnums v. 75cl v. 37.5cl as many Taylor vintages were bottled in both of those.
And we really ought to compare British v. Oporto bottlings.
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 16:18 Sat 28 Feb 2009
by jdaw1
JacobH wrote:And we really ought to compare British v. Oporto bottlings.
This is really a separate tasting. There are many UK bottlers, varying from excellent to not so. They can’t be lumped together. I’d much rather work on a couple of vintages, say ’63 and ’70, and two or three wines from each (not necessarily the same), with multiple bottlers.
JacobH wrote:A legitimate add-on to this tasting would be magnums v. 75cl v. 37.5cl as many Taylor vintages were bottled in both of those.
No would make the Taylor vertical too large.
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 20:32 Sat 28 Feb 2009
by Andy Velebil
jdaw1 wrote:My UK stocks include 1912 1924 1927 1948 1955 1963 1970 1977 1980 1985 and, though it probably wouldn’t be needed, 1985 in magnum.
This isn’t a serious suggestion for a one-day tasting, of course. We’d need a long weekend.
Yeah that would be a fun weekend....if it ever happens let me know I'd fly out for that one for sure.
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 21:30 Sat 28 Feb 2009
by Axel P
Me, too.
Axel
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 21:57 Sat 28 Feb 2009
by jdaw1
Andy V wrote:Yeah that would be a fun weekend....if it ever happens let me know I'd fly out for that one for sure.
Axel P wrote:Me, too.
What do you two have?
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 22:17 Sat 28 Feb 2009
by Andy Velebil
oldest taylors is a 1920 vp
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 23:26 Sat 28 Feb 2009
by jdaw1
If fourteen of us are sharing sixty bottles each person should provide more than one. What younger Taylor VPs do you have?
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 00:45 Sun 01 Mar 2009
by DRT
I can confirm that I am in for this one, even though we are not supposed to say it will ever happen because AHB says it a serious suggestion.
My collection of Taylor is virtually non-existent.
60 bottles for 14 people over two days is slightly less than the
![The Port Forum :tpf:](./images/smilies/tpf.gif)
standard vertical of 35 per day.
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 00:55 Sun 01 Mar 2009
by jdaw1
The non-serious part was that it should be a one-day tasting. AHB needless to say was entirely serious about the idea of a complete Taylor vertical. But not in one session.
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 01:28 Sun 01 Mar 2009
by JacobH
jdaw1 wrote:The non-serious part was that it should be a one-day tasting. AHB needless to say was entirely serious about the idea of a complete Taylor vertical. But not in one session.
A complete 20th C. Taylor vertical would be a mere 27 bottles; it’s adding the Vargellas that causes it to be a lunch+dinner prospect...
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 01:40 Sun 01 Mar 2009
by jdaw1
JacobH wrote:A complete 20th C. Taylor vertical would be a mere 27 bottles; it’s adding the Vargellas that causes it to be a lunch+dinner prospect...
By British
![The Port Forum :tpf:](./images/smilies/tpf.gif)
standards I might be a light-weight, but I’d rather split twenty-seven bottles into two sessions. For my modest capacity the Vargellas suggested a multi-day tasting.
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 01:49 Sun 01 Mar 2009
by DRT
JacobH wrote:jdaw1 wrote:The non-serious part was that it should be a one-day tasting. AHB needless to say was entirely serious about the idea of a complete Taylor vertical. But not in one session.
A complete 20th C. Taylor vertical would be a mere 27 bottles; it’s adding the Vargellas that causes it to be a lunch+dinner prospect...
I'm still slightly confused as to why it could not be an 1815-2006(7?) vertical. If we included a Friday afternoon and evening as well as Morning, afternoon and evening on Saturday and Sunday that would give us 8 sessions of 18 bottles = 144. That would allow us to amend the title to a snappier "A Gross of Taylor Vintages"
![Cool 88)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 01:58 Sun 01 Mar 2009
by JacobH
DRT wrote:I'm still slightly confused as to why it could not be an 1815-2006(7?) vertical. If we included a Friday afternoon and evening as well as Morning, afternoon and evening on Saturday and Sunday that would give us 8 sessions of 18 bottles = 144. That would allow us to amend the title to a snappier "A Gross of Taylor Vintages"
![Cool 88)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
I was simply following the rule of AHB who pronounced it thus. If I were to have a say, I add would released and unreleased Terra Feita vintages, which I think are somewhat undervalued.
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 02:24 Sun 01 Mar 2009
by jdaw1
DRT wrote:A Gross of Taylor Vintages
I’m in.
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 02:59 Sun 01 Mar 2009
by Andy Velebil
I like...we could do the VP on one day and the Vargellas on another
![Cool 88)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 03:03 Sun 01 Mar 2009
by DRT
That seems to be 3 confirmed attendees and a 144 bottle line-up.
Does that constitute a quorum?
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 03:28 Sun 01 Mar 2009
by DRT
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 03:36 Sun 01 Mar 2009
by jdaw1
DRT wrote:That seems to be 3 confirmed attendees and a 144 bottle line-up.
Does that constitute a quorum?
And then we was robbed! Only 106 Taylors. We will need that magnum of 1985.
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 03:45 Sun 01 Mar 2009
by DRT
jdaw1 wrote:DRT wrote:That seems to be 3 confirmed attendees and a 144 bottle line-up.
Does that constitute a quorum?
Quorate. Agreed.
jdaw1 wrote:And then we was robbed! Only 106 Taylors. We will need that magnum of 1985.
Fear not. The list of 1800's wines is not yet complete. We should have no trouble making 144 and may even be able to weed out some weaklings. 1975?
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 03:48 Sun 01 Mar 2009
by DRT
Is it time to move this to the appropriate section of the forum?
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 04:05 Sun 01 Mar 2009
by jdaw1
Even if we have the ‘small’ list of 106 Taylors, we can still lose the 1975.
Re: A complete vertical of 20th century vintages of Taylor
Posted: 04:06 Sun 01 Mar 2009
by jdaw1
DRT wrote:Is it time to move this to the appropriate section of the forum?
Organising Tastings and Get-togethers? I had forgotten that it wasn’t there. Sure.