1985 Churchill

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23245
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

1985 Churchill

Post by jdaw1 »

At the generous instigation of Alex B.: “Please, no-one bring anything except where I have asked for help. This is supposed to be a cellar reduction party so I am happy to supply various bottles for us to share. A handful of people know some of what will be brought, but I'll serve all bottles blind.”

So we went to a Helen-less Bung Hole to meet Amy — who had just left for the day. (No problem: we met her two days later.)

Links:
User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1851
Posts: 23245
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1985 Churchill

Post by jdaw1 »

Ch85. Darkish red, 70% opaque. Nose not noted. Palate slightly rough, and had something bright and fresh and vegetal which I didn’t like.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Graham’s 1948
Posts: 14366
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1985 Churchill

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

A cork which shredded as it was removed. Deep red, early maturity. Fresh roses on the perfumed nose, very floral and attractive. Gentle tannins with higher alcohols giving a twist to the flavours. A touch simple but still attractive and with nice fruit on the palate. Quite sweet and sugary on the short finish. 87/100. Drunk 26-Aug-14. 12 hour decant.
Top Ports in 2022: Quinta do Noval Nacional 1931. I have never drunk such a wonderful bottle of Port. I cried with joy.

2023: Fonseca 1966. There are not many better Ports, except a good bottle of Fonseca 1927. Wow!
Post Reply