1960 Quinta do Rei

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply

User avatar
jdaw1
Cockburn 1900
Posts: 20497
Joined: 15:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1960 Quinta do Rei

Post by jdaw1 » 19:05 Tue 25 May 2010

R60: Quinta do where? More work for the declaration database. Anyway, the nose a hint woody. To taste rich and sweet, but spoiled by an acrid early-palate taste.

User avatar
Chris Doty
Warre’s Otima 20 year old Tawny
Posts: 690
Joined: 12:30 Fri 29 Jan 2010

Re: 1960 Quinta do Rei

Post by Chris Doty » 12:34 Mon 07 Jun 2010

A bit tart, something that felt like 'under-steer' on the finish. Not bad, and actually a bit impressive that it could almost hold its own, given the company it was placed in. 82

User avatar
AHB
Quinta do Noval Nacional 1962
Posts: 11871
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1960 Quinta do Rei

Post by AHB » 10:37 Sun 27 Jun 2010

Messias owned Quinta. Light centre, the lightest in colour of the final flight (Rei, Dow, Graham, Warre, Martinez). Attractive and elegant nose - full of dusty junipers. Good texture, quite thick with modest initial impact. Slightly simple, but terrific texture across the palate and all the flavours which are present are balanced and enjoyable. Light, but very flavoursome aftertaste and a thick, redcurrant jelly finish. Very tasty and a pleasant surprise. 89/100.
Top Ports in 2018 (so far): Niepoort VV (1960's Bottling), Quinta do Noval Nacional 1994 and San Leonardo Very Old White (Bottled 2018)
2017 Ports of the year: Fonseca 1927 and Quinta do Noval 1927

User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15221
Joined: 23:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: 1960 Quinta do Rei

Post by DRT » 17:14 Thu 14 Oct 2010

Nice fruity nose - good weight with some tannin - dry, then very sweet in the finish.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn

Post Reply