1983 Cockburn

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
Fonseca 1963
Posts: 12129
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

1983 Cockburn Vintage Port

Post by AHB » 21:24 Sat 01 Sep 2007

The second of the pair of bottles of Cockburn '83 that I purchased in March 2006. Decanted cleanly and easily off some well settled and heavy sediment (after only 1 day of standing upright). The nose on decanting was muted and a little musty.

After 2½ hours in the decanter the wine was a clear and sparkling deep ruby. The nose was of sweet redcurrants but with still with a dusty / musty tone that distracted from what could have been very attractive. In the mouth the wine brought an initial impact of sweet and ripe redcurrants and cranberries. Plenty of acidity providing structure in the mid palate but not a huge amount of development. The tannins come through late and are clearly evident - and surprisingly dense - on the aftertaste, which is very pleasant and brings a lot of aniseed.

A decent wine, but very much in the middle of the pack and not a bottle that supports the very positive reviews that this wine obtains from some drinkers. 5/6 or 87/ 100.
Top Ports in 2018 (so far): Niepoort VV (1960's Bottling), Quinta do Noval Nacional 1994 and San Leonardo Very Old White (Bottled 2018)
2017 Ports of the year: Fonseca 1927 and Quinta do Noval 1927

User avatar
Fonseca 1980
Posts: 1979
Joined: 08:28 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: Middle Earth

Post by RonnieRoots » 23:22 Sun 02 Sep 2007

There seems to be a lot of bottle variaton with this port. Luckily I've encountered a good bottle both times I had this, and I can assure you that it's a very good port when it's in a good state (does that sentence make any sense...?)

Post Reply