1984 Smith Woodhouse LBV (unfiltered)

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
AHB
Fonseca 1963
Posts: 12773
Joined: 13:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

1984 Smith Woodhouse LBV (unfiltered)

Post by AHB » 15:41 Fri 02 Nov 2007

Opened on 31 October 2007 and drunk after 8 hours in the decanter.

A freshly labelled and "sello-ed" bottle that looks to have been a recent ex-cellars release. Decanted off a large amount of heavy sediment. Noted that the wine was bottled in 1988 so only 1 year later than would have qualified to be released as a vintage port. Ruby red in colour, turning orange at the rim. Some bottle stink at first but this blew off over the evening and revealed some lovely raspberry juice although the alcohol was a little unintegrated. Sweet entry and plenty of body with lots of the liquorice you would expect in a bottle in is secondary stages of life, some contamination from the bottle stink flavours but this faded over the evening. Plenty going on in the mid-palate. The length is good and interesting, showing nice Angostura Bitters or Quinine tones that last quite a while after a bit of heat on first swallowing. The mid-palate and aftertaste are strong features of this wine. My wine of the night. 91/100.
Top Ports in 2019: Niepoort VV (1960s bottling) and Quinta do Noval Nacional 2017
Top Ports in 2020 (so far): Croft 1945 and Niepoort VV (1960s bottling)

User avatar
SushiNorth
Martinez 1985
Posts: 1319
Joined: 07:45 Mon 18 Feb 2008
Location: NJ & NY

Post by SushiNorth » 22:13 Thu 19 Jun 2008

Sounds like it may be worth getting one for $30, but perhaps not two.
SushiNorth
Image Port wine should perhaps be added -- A Trollope

Post Reply