I'll extend that into a more general question: what do you all use as a guideline for maturity in halves, all other things being equal? Half the time - 11.5 years..? Or more, or less, and why?[url=http://www.theportforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=9458]Here[/url], in Phil's post about GM and WC halves, I wrote:I wonder what you'd think about Warre 00 halves that are also in storage? Not sure how long they should be left. I was told when purchasing that they were 'drinking beautifully now'.
General query on maturity in half bottles
- djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8165
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
General query on maturity in half bottles
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
It's good that you've widened the scope of the question. I personaly would welcome a guideline, too. But I'm afraid that it all depends on individual ports with their individual vintages (like so many things in life, there will probably be no easy answer).
The Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt know thy Port
-
- Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
- Posts: 3707
- Joined: 17:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
- Location: Somerset, UK
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
I have never had much luck with half bottles. I say luck because I have tended to buy half bottles on the spur of the moment and at retail. There is a gamble on any half bottle of wine in a shop, I am not sure if they are treated less kindly, hang about for longer or are more susceptible to the thousand natural shocks that flesh is heir to. But it seems to me they age disproportionately quickly, I avoid half bottles of port because of this. It is hard to pin down a time limit on them and I am sure that there will be many examples drawn from experience to refute my guess but I would say not more than 25 years. In other words they are on their way out when standard bottles are getting going.
I also admit that I avoid half bottles because they seem a bit meagre.
I also admit that I avoid half bottles because they seem a bit meagre.
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
If we take 750ml bottle maturity as a baseline I think 375ml bottle maturity almost exactly follows an exponential curve.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
In which case, what about the maturity of magnums or double magnums? Would these be twice the maturity of a regular bottle? The magnums I have had of older ports have not drank that much differently than regular bottles (next Christmas, by way of experiment, I will give a try at a 77 Graham magnum versus bottle - although there are certainly some questions as to quality of Graham 1977).
If there is a difference between the maturity of a half and full bottle, what would cause this, and would this not apply to larger formats?
If there is a difference between the maturity of a half and full bottle, what would cause this, and would this not apply to larger formats?
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
These things do not happen in straight lines and bottle variation blurs the picture, but I have no doubt whatsoever that small bottles age faster than large bottles. I suspect it has something to do with the ratio of oxygen to wine in the bottle, small bottles having a greater proportion of oxygen to wine than larger bottles. The same principle is at work in wooden casks, which is why they are topped-up to avoid the wine oxidising too quickly.TLW wrote:In which case, what about the maturity of magnums or double magnums? Would these be twice the maturity of a regular bottle?
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
That seems very plausible. But how do you know that the problem isn’t with ill-fitting corks?DRT wrote:I suspect it has something to do with the ratio of oxygen to wine in the bottle, small bottles having a greater proportion of oxygen to wine than larger bottles.
Except, of course, those destined not to be drunk until very old.DRT wrote:The same principle is at work in wooden casks, which is why they are topped-up to avoid the wine oxidising too quickly.
- djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8165
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
Did I hear the word 'exponential'?
I wonder if halves mature quicker but then follow a different pattern / curve? I mean, why should the plateau or secondary-tertiary transition follow the same proportion as the initial maturation? We need to do a long trial with small, standard and large formats. This should keep us busy into old age.
I wonder if halves mature quicker but then follow a different pattern / curve? I mean, why should the plateau or secondary-tertiary transition follow the same proportion as the initial maturation? We need to do a long trial with small, standard and large formats. This should keep us busy into old age.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
-
- Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
- Posts: 3520
- Joined: 14:22 Wed 15 Dec 2010
- Location: Near Cambridge, UK
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
Yes, but you missed that it was preceded by "almost exactly". I almost replied "+1.".djewesbury wrote:Did I hear the word 'exponential'?
- djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8165
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
+2PhilW wrote:Yes, but you missed that it was preceded by "almost exactly". I almost replied "+1.".djewesbury wrote:Did I hear the word 'exponential'?
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
I remember from somewhere that surfaces act as sites for molecules to interact, generally increasing rates of reaction. Surfaces include glass, cork and suspended/deposited particles. Smaller bottles have a higher ratio of glass to liquid. Perhaps this is also a factor?
- djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8165
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
This makes sense; in which case there's no reason why a half bottle would mature twice as fast as a standard bottle. In fact the acceleration could be much quicker; can anyone here work out the internal surface area of the normal half and standard bottles and this calculate the ratio of the liquid to the glass? Thanks.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
If we can approximate the surface area of the liquid to that of a cylinder (which we can only do if the bottle is stored upright) then the surface area calculation is:-
Area=2πrh+2π r^2
Where r is the radius (to internal wall) of the cylinder and h is the height (of the liquid).
Area=2πrh+2π r^2
Where r is the radius (to internal wall) of the cylinder and h is the height (of the liquid).
- djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8165
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
Yes, go on… Do you need me to measure a bottle??JWEW wrote:If we can approximate the surface area of the liquid to that of a cylinder (which we can only do if the bottle is stored upright) then the surface area calculation is:-
Area=2πrh+2π r^2
Where r is the radius (to internal wall) of the cylinder and h is the height (of the liquid).
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
djewesbury wrote:Yes, go on… Do you need me to measure a bottle??JWEW wrote:If we can approximate the surface area of the liquid to that of a cylinder (which we can only do if the bottle is stored upright) then the surface area calculation is:-
Area=2πrh+2π r^2
Where r is the radius (to internal wall) of the cylinder and h is the height (of the liquid).
If you wish. I have no bottles of any format handy to measure, nor a tape measure to use.
- djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8165
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
Measurements (appx) of the internal, cylindrical part of the bottle:
standard: 65 x 195 mm
half: 55 x 145 mm
internal area of standard bottle = 46456 mm2
internal area of half bottle = 17279 mm2
is that right?
now what?
standard: 65 x 195 mm
half: 55 x 145 mm
internal area of standard bottle = 46456 mm2
internal area of half bottle = 17279 mm2
is that right?
now what?
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
Don't think that's correct.djewesbury wrote:Measurements (appx) of the internal, cylindrical part of the bottle:
standard: 65 x 195 mm
half: 55 x 145 mm
internal area of standard bottle = 46456 mm2
internal area of half bottle = 17279 mm2
is that right?
now what?
For a radius of 65mm and height 195mm I get area= 106185 mm^2
and for radius of 55mm, height 145mm I get an area of 69115mm^2
The volume of the cylinder is πr2h so the volume of the above cylinders will be
2588280 mm^3 and 1377981mm^3
So the surface are to volume ratio for the larger bottle would be 106185/2588280 = 0.041025
and for the smaller is 69115/1377981 = 0.050157
meaning that the smaller bottle has 122% [(0.050157/ 0.041025) *100] higher SA/V ratio than the larger bottle.
I hereby issue a disclaimer absolving myself of all blame in case the above calculation turns our to be rubbish.
- djewesbury
- Graham’s 1970
- Posts: 8165
- Joined: 20:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
That seems a very small difference. Is that really sufficient to speed up the development so markedly? Do smaller volumes of liquid do something else differently, in comparison to larger ones?
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
Am thinking surfaces only a factor. I agree that oxygen concentrations could be the major influence. Suspect it is complicated. If surfaces play a part, then quantity and type of crust and suspended material is also a factor as these would also be sites for reactions.DRT wrote:I suspect it has something to do with the ratio of oxygen to wine in the bottle, small bottles having a greater proportion of oxygen to wine than larger bottles. The same principle is at work in wooden casks, which is why they are topped-up to avoid the wine oxidising too quickly.
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
The "cork ratio" should be double, though, and that's where the oxygen comes from. (Halves and 750s use the same corks, but surprise! a 750 contains twice as much liquid as a half.)DaveRL wrote:Am thinking surfaces only a factor. I agree that oxygen concentrations could be the major influence. Suspect it is complicated. If surfaces play a part, then quantity and type of crust and suspended material is also a factor as these would also be sites for reactions.DRT wrote:I suspect it has something to do with the ratio of oxygen to wine in the bottle, small bottles having a greater proportion of oxygen to wine than larger bottles. The same principle is at work in wooden casks, which is why they are topped-up to avoid the wine oxidising too quickly.
Double the oxygen, 120% of the surface area, who knows what other factors... there are plenty of potential factors that could explain it. I, personally, would not have said that a 375 ages twice as fast as a 750. That just hasn't been my experience. But they definitely age faster.
Glenn Elliott
- differentdave
- Fonseca LBV
- Posts: 143
- Joined: 18:38 Mon 25 Feb 2008
- Location: Long Island, New York
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
http://www.winespectator.com/blogs/show/id/49398
James laube from winespectator approaches this topic by tasting 18 year old wines from same producer from 5 different bottle sizes (Chateau St. Jean Cinq Cépages 1995 in five iterations: methuselah, jeroboam, magnum, standard and half-bottle.).
James laube from winespectator approaches this topic by tasting 18 year old wines from same producer from 5 different bottle sizes (Chateau St. Jean Cinq Cépages 1995 in five iterations: methuselah, jeroboam, magnum, standard and half-bottle.).
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
DaveRL wrote:I remember from somewhere that surfaces act as sites for molecules to interact, generally increasing rates of reaction. Surfaces include glass, cork and suspended/deposited particles. Smaller bottles have a higher ratio of glass to liquid. Perhaps this is also a factor?
Not sure any of that is relevant, or the subsequent calculations. While it is true to say that surfaces can act as sites for molecules to interact, that is only true if the molecules are of the type that do interact, I think. I'm fairly certain that port and glass do not cause any type of reaction.djewesbury wrote:This makes sense; in which case there's no reason why a half bottle would mature twice as fast as a standard bottle. In fact the acceleration could be much quicker; can anyone here work out the internal surface area of the normal half and standard bottles and this calculate the ratio of the liquid to the glass? Thanks.
I would think that amount of sediment plays a part in maturation, but that is likely to have significant variation between individual bottles and across shippers, which on average would not explain a generally observed trend that 375s mature more quickly than 750s.
Is there really any dispute that the mix of port to oxygen is the most likely and most significant driver of maturation level differences between 375s and 750s?
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
I say all the above, having not actually ever owned or opened a 375 of port. So I have never really examined the fill level on an 375 and what that means for the ratio of oxygen to port in that size of bottle. Is the volume not occupied by liquid in a 375 usually a good bit more than 50% of that in a 750 bottle? If not, then the oxygen/port ratio theory for maturation might be nonsense.
edit:
hence I now also understand Julian's query:
edit:
hence I now also understand Julian's query:
If the cork in a 375 neck is shorter, then could this result in greater leakage of some air into the bottle at a faster rate than with a 750? Or does this not happen? Lots of questions!jdaw1 wrote:That seems very plausible. But how do you know that the problem isn’t with ill-fitting corks?DRT wrote:I suspect it has something to do with the ratio of oxygen to wine in the bottle, small bottles having a greater proportion of oxygen to wine than larger bottles.
-
- Warre’s Traditional LBV
- Posts: 330
- Joined: 17:45 Mon 23 May 2011
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
Why can't certain things be allowed to remain mysteries like how does the graphite get crammed into pencils or how are bucatini made?
It seems to me that even a perfect formula for half bottle maturation is still a less satisfactory method than that of pulling a cork on periodic sample bottles.
It seems to me that even a perfect formula for half bottle maturation is still a less satisfactory method than that of pulling a cork on periodic sample bottles.
Re: General query on maturity in half bottles
I'm fairly certain glass (SiO2 etc) will have some weak ionic forces attracting some molecules in port encouraging mechanical catalysis of at least some reactions. Do decanters not stain red? It doesn't need to be a strong bond, or even for long, to decrease a degree of freedom and speed up a complicated reaction.flash_uk wrote:Not sure any of that is relevant, or the subsequent calculations. While it is true to say that surfaces can act as sites for molecules to interact, that is only true if the molecules are of the type that do interact, I think. I'm fairly certain that port and glass do not cause any type of reaction.
That was my question - is it an increase in oxygen concentrations, or an increase in the rates of reaction? Worth a thought.flash_uk wrote:Is there really any dispute that the mix of port to oxygen is the most likely and most significant driver of maturation level differences between 375s and 750s?