1955 Mackenzie

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24323
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

1955 Mackenzie

Post by jdaw1 »

At Bonham’s on 18 February 2016 was sold most of a pipe of Fonseca 1963, not moved since original purchase (lots 324 to 343).

So, on Wednesday 15th June 2016, we gathered in the Boot & Flogger to compare six of these, which were joined by a selection of other English-bottled Vintage Ports.

Links:
User avatar
flash_uk
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4492
Joined: 19:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: 1955 Mackenzie

Post by flash_uk »

55% opacity, full red. Dried fruit and bubblegum on the nose. Full, syrupy, mild heat early and mid palate. Fruit - strawberry very present, finish lacks structure, tannins gone.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15645
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1955 Mackenzie

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Deep red, very dark appearance - the tone of a good port from 1985. A faint nose at first showing fierce dark fruit and a tiny touch of VA. 90 minutes later this showed fresh black cherries. Sweet black cherries on entry, saccharine sweetness rather than the natural sweetness of ripe fruit. The dark cherry fruit dominates the initial aftertaste with definite black chocolate tannins showing on the finish.

Reassuringly familiar to the previous bottle drunk 6 years previously, but still an astonishing port for its age and the fact this comes from an unregarded shipper. 88/100.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
Post Reply