1980 Gould Campbell

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24302
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

1980 Gould Campbell

Post by jdaw1 »

User avatar
flash_uk
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4453
Joined: 19:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: 1980 Gould Campbell

Post by flash_uk »

65% opacity, red-brown, amber rim. Cloudy. Plummy nose. Full mouthfeel, lively, rich sweetness, red fruit, chocolate. Lovely port, nowhere near mature. The GC80 bottle showed much younger than the GC80 magnum alongside. The bottle evolution was consistent with other GC80 bottles I have had, so I would say the magnum was showing the more unexpected evolution.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15632
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1980 Gould Campbell

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Very dark red colour, younger looking than the magnum tasted alongside this glass; 90% opaque. Nothing on the nose but lots of swirling gives some stewed red fruit. Despite the restraint on the palate the palate is lovely with lots of lively red fruit with cinnamon and dark bramble fruit. A delicious, youthful mouthful. Soft tannins show on the aftertaste giving a slightly chewy sensaton. A bit cloying on the finish, reminiscent of red jelly babies. A bit unbalanced but by no means a bad port. 86/100. Decanted 5 hours.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24302
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1980 Gould Campbell

Post by jdaw1 »

GC80 (single): dark dark red, 90% opaque. Mid sweetness, full, soft and round, mid-weight, better-than-mid length. Good not great.
Post Reply