2017 Skeffington

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24574
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 2017 Skeffington

Post by jdaw1 »

Sk17: good structure but no fruit showing. Will age well.
NickA
Fonseca Bin 27
Posts: 73
Joined: 14:11 Fri 31 May 2019

Re: 2017 Skeffington

Post by NickA »

B9: Dusty note on nose; plenty of fruit… This was to be my last tasting note of the night and I didn’t exactly finish it! I recall it had the expected fruit than the corked bottle at a previous tasting (clearly) missed. Would be wrong to rate it but certainly nothing wrong with it or I would have written so!
User avatar
rich_n
Graham’s Malvedos 1996
Posts: 766
Joined: 09:59 Thu 23 May 2019

Re: 2017 Skeffington

Post by rich_n »

Some dark fruits, cranberries, chocolate and spice. Strongly dominated by the tannins in the mouthfeel. Quite closed, but opened up with more time in the glass. Potential.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15922
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 2017 Skeffington

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Tasted blind. Deep red colour; clean spirit and a touch of blueberry fruit on the nose. The sweet blueberry fruit comes through on the palate with a delightful roundness to the fruit. And then massive tannins grab hold and grip firmly! The tannins are huge and very firm around the delicious and fragrant fruit. The aftertaste is good with generous levels of fruit and a finish of intense dark chocolate. This Port has a huge, brutal palate but is a style I very much like. 90-92/100.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
Post Reply