1970 Graham

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
nac
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2209
Joined: 13:21 Fri 16 Dec 2016
Location: Kent & London
Contact:

1970 Graham

Post by nac »

Presented blind by IDJ on Tuesday 25th February 2020 - Emergency @ 67 Pall Mall

Holding note
winesecretary
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2311
Joined: 14:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: 1970 Graham

Post by winesecretary »

Distinctly red wine. Some rubber and varnish on the nose, but that blew off. Very reminiscent of the Graham 1970 I had at New Year, but with the good qualities (rich sweet poached red fruits and red liquorice) better displayed, and the difficulties (rubbery quality) very much less pronounced. This is very good port. I guessed Graham 1970, but easy because I had had it so recently.
User avatar
flash_uk
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4452
Joined: 19:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: 1970 Graham

Post by flash_uk »

35% opacity, clear rich red. Dark fruit and spice on the nose. Powerful, full mouthfeel, dark fruit, some pepper, gentle tannins, spice, heat in the finish. I guessed T66 on account of the pepper/spiciness.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15619
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1970 Graham

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

A mature red with an element of brick in the tone; 50% opaque. A nose very similar to the Taylor 1980 being shown alongside, with dusty and candied cherry. A lovely, languid texture, with a great set of fruit flavours. Sweet and beautiful with such an elegant aftertaste that leads to a full and rich finish. This is wonderful, delicious Port. Served blind, this was guessed to be Fonseca 1970. 93/100. Tasted 25-Feb-20. Decanted 12½ hours.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
Post Reply