2000 Cockburn

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24574
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

2000 Cockburn

Post by jdaw1 »

As organised by George G., on Monday 10th February 2025, Some of the usual folks gathered in the Boot & Flogger, for a horizontal of 2000s.

Woe betide! What has become of us‽ A horizontal of Port from this century. Yes yes, the world has other disasters afoot, but this disaster is afoot here: what has become of us‽

Links: † Please allow, or at least forgive, the non-pedantic definition.
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24574
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 2000 Cockburn

Post by jdaw1 »

Ck00. Dark dark red, 90% opaque. Different! Green vegetable notes, black pepper (rather than the other ’00s’ white pepper), and good size. Decent Port, but not my preference.
winesecretary
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2438
Joined: 14:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: 2000 Cockburn

Post by winesecretary »

This is quite nice port, but not distinguished in this company.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15922
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 2000 Cockburn

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

A murky looking wine, full of fine sediment as well as lumpy sediment. Smelling slightly stewed on the nose. Also a touch stewed on the palate, lacking in fruit and with a dirty tone. Dry, slightly earthy finish. Not enjoyable. 84/100
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
Post Reply