Last night we had a tasting of Smith-Woodhouse from the 1990s: the 1991, 1994 & 1997 VPs and the 1995 SW Madalena (a particular favorite as it is quite affordable and a lovely Port). All bottles decanted about 5 hours before--could have done with a few more hours but decent enough. SW to me is typically a dark, brooding port but full of fruit and vigor when tasted. Love the brand!
Noticed the older it got, the browner the aurora/rim got. But looking at the four glasses they initially looked identical in color until closer examination revealed differences. The 1991 was the most surprising---while the 1994 was the WOTN, the 1991 was close behind. It was the most evolved of the four--i.e. closest to it's peak. 1994 and 1995 would benefit from more aging.
Ports were served blind. Tasters knew were all SW and pre-2000. Scores were consistent - I am JJM and was the most generous is scorer. For WOTN 1994 got 6 votes, 1992 4 votes and one for the 1995.
2025: Smith Woodhouse from the 1990s
2025: Smith Woodhouse from the 1990s
- Attachments
-
- SW 1990s.png (86.96 KiB) Viewed 16723 times
Last edited by Big Love on 10:46 Sun 30 Mar 2025, edited 1 time in total.
- Alex Bridgeman
- Fonseca 1966
- Posts: 15922
- Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Berkshire, UK
Re: Smith Woodhouse from the 1990s
John - that sounds like a great tasting. I love SW and would have enjoyed most or all of those wines.
But just to confirm, you tasted the SW91, not the SW92?
But just to confirm, you tasted the SW91, not the SW92?
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
Re: Smith Woodhouse from the 1990s
SW91.....edited the above.