1997 Niepoort

Anything to do with Port.
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8166
Joined: 19:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: 1997 Niepoort

Post by djewesbury »

Andy Velebil wrote:I live in a dessert
Really? Is it a treacle tart? Or a salted caramel ice-cream sandwich..?
Sorry. :D
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Andy Velebil
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3084
Joined: 21:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
Contact:

Re: 1997 Niepoort

Post by Andy Velebil »

djewesbury wrote:
Andy Velebil wrote:I live in a dessert
Really? Is it a treacle tart? Or a salted caramel ice-cream sandwich..?
Sorry. :D
I prefer sea salt caramel with a vanilla bean base. But sometimes just plain 'ol chocolate will do :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24574
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1997 Niepoort

Post by jdaw1 »

djewesbury wrote:I would have thought that the expansion of the glass (are we talking microns here?) would be even in each direction - meaning that the space inside the bottle would actually contract...
The external size would increase by more than the internal size, but both would increase.

Figure 2 of this essay entitled Thermal expansion measurement of glasses suggests, at relevant temperatures, expansion of less than 10 parts per million per degree C. So heating by 50°C would expand the glass by less than 500 ppm. For a 20mm hole that’s an expansion of less than ≈ 0.01mm. Surely too small to matter.
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8166
Joined: 19:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: 1997 Niepoort

Post by djewesbury »

jdaw1 wrote:
djewesbury wrote:I would have thought that the expansion of the glass (are we talking microns here?) would be even in each direction - meaning that the space inside the bottle would actually contract...
The external size would increase by more than the internal size, but both would increase.

Figure 2 of this essay entitled Thermal expansion measurement of glasses suggests, at relevant temperatures, expansion of less than 10 parts per million per degree C. So heating by 50°C would expand the glass by less than 500 ppm. For a 20mm hole that’s an expansion of less than ≈ 0.01mm. Surely too small to matter.
Fascinating. So.. who did we conclude was right / was wrong / could remember the question?

You just don't get this level of debate on wine-pages.com.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15786
Joined: 22:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: 1997 Niepoort

Post by DRT »

djewesbury wrote:Fascinating. So.. who did we conclude was right / was wrong / could remember the question?
I think we all agreed that buying Niepoort 1997 is a silly thing to do :D
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Andy Velebil
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3084
Joined: 21:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
Contact:

Re: 1997 Niepoort

Post by Andy Velebil »

DRT wrote:
djewesbury wrote:Fascinating. So.. who did we conclude was right / was wrong / could remember the question?
I think we all agreed that buying Niepoort 1997 is a silly thing to do :D
+1
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15922
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1997 Niepoort

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

But if you have bought some you should open it and drink it and hope it shows as well as the one which Gerwin had.

And if you bought more than one, you should drink more than one.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4422
Joined: 21:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: 1997 Niepoort

Post by Glenn E. »

AHB wrote:But if you have bought some you should open it and drink it and hope it shows as well as the one which Gerwin had.

And if you bought more than one, you should drink more than one.
I had one that was quite nice, too. And I still have 5 more from the same 6-pack. 88)
Glenn Elliott
User avatar
g-man
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3429
Joined: 12:50 Wed 24 Oct 2007
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: 1997 Niepoort

Post by g-man »

I had an okay one too. here

I recalled it being very spirity though.
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8166
Joined: 19:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

1997 Niepoort

Post by djewesbury »

I bought a 750ml and 3 375mls. We are drinking D80 tonight, and then away for the weekend (drinking a D63 in Edinburgh, in the building in which it was bottled). So it'll be next week before I get the chance to do this, bit at the earliest opportunity I will open the 750 and one of the 375s, and of course post a TN here.

I like (as in, don't like) the fact that Roy makes you justify your TNs. 'What do you mean, rich heat? Explain yourself!'
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
User avatar
g-man
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3429
Joined: 12:50 Wed 24 Oct 2007
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: 1997 Niepoort

Post by g-man »

djewesbury wrote: I like (as in, don't like) the fact that Roy makes you justify your TNs. 'What do you mean, rich heat? Explain yourself!'
well there could be cause for confusion with just heat

i mean if you had to bburn phone books for heat im sure you'd get that ink and newpaper smell

vs if you can afford some pine wood you get that fresh pine smell.

see how important the adjectives are?
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4422
Joined: 21:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: 1997 Niepoort

Post by Glenn E. »

djewesbury wrote:I like (as in, don't like) the fact that Roy makes you justify your TNs. 'What do you mean, rich heat? Explain yourself!'
:roll:

Did you understand what I meant by "rich heat" without the further explanation I posted after Roy's question?
Glenn Elliott
User avatar
g-man
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3429
Joined: 12:50 Wed 24 Oct 2007
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: 1997 Niepoort

Post by g-man »

Glenn E. wrote:
djewesbury wrote:I like (as in, don't like) the fact that Roy makes you justify your TNs. 'What do you mean, rich heat? Explain yourself!'
:roll:

Did you understand what I meant by "rich heat" without the further explanation I posted after Roy's question?
see my definition =)

btw Fonseca 66 has the qualities you describe ;-)
Disclosure: Distributor of Quevedo wines and Quinta do Gomariz
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4422
Joined: 21:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: 1997 Niepoort

Post by Glenn E. »

g-man wrote:btw Fonseca 66 has the qualities you describe ;-)
Yes, I know. My point was that Roy's curiosity about what I meant was perfectly reasonable, and not a demand that I explain myself.
Glenn Elliott
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8166
Joined: 19:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

1997 Niepoort

Post by djewesbury »

I got it, I mean, a rich heat is not thin or too fiery.. But I am willing to accept that Roy was just curious!
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
User avatar
marc j.
Fonseca LBV
Posts: 103
Joined: 03:44 Tue 07 Jul 2009
Location: Malibu, CA.

Re: 1997 Niepoort

Post by marc j. »

AHB wrote:But if you have bought some you should open it and drink it and hope it shows as well as the one which Gerwin had.

And if you bought more than one, you should drink more than one.
Time to pop some corks...
Post Reply