I seem to have a carpet of Graham ’77 covering everything except this. As the Graham still wants some keeping I had another of these.
I was a bit unkind to this wine in the previous post. It seems livelier than the last bottle. There is a lot more liquorice and fruit. Very sweet to taste, almost young with a lovely rasp of tannin at the end. It should keep for a lot of years. I wonder if this is bottle variation or just me. I am not minded to change my score though; 6-6.
1985 Smith Woodhouse
- Alex Bridgeman
- Fonseca 1966
- Posts: 15922
- Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
- Location: Berkshire, UK
Re: 1985 Smith Woodhouse vintage port
Were these two separate bottles of SW85? If so, would you mind if we got one of the admins to split the second post to a different thread so it shows up as a separate tasting notes?
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.
2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
-
- Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
- Posts: 3707
- Joined: 16:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
- Location: Somerset, UK
Re: 1985 Smith Woodhouse vintage port
Yes two separate bottles, I'm still finding my way a bit with posting etiquette. Please feel free to perform whatever jiggery-pokery you need to make this work.
Re: 1985 Smith Woodhouse vintage port
Both the jiggery and the pokery have now been completed successfully.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
-
- Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
- Posts: 3707
- Joined: 16:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
- Location: Somerset, UK
Re: 1985 Smith Woodhouse vintage port
Thank-you. I shall stick to one bottle at a time from now on, in my notes at least.