1983 Taylor

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24574
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1983 Taylor

Post by jdaw1 »

Image
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24574
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1983 Taylor

Post by jdaw1 »

T83. Red, 30% opaque. Nose had woody acidity. Palate started as acceptable, then became awful. After that initial sip, not drunk.
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8166
Joined: 19:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: 1983 Taylor

Post by djewesbury »

45% opaque, mid-red with brown. If the Fonseca smelled of twig, this smelled of twiglet. In the mouth it was like a basic tawny with insufficient age. Unimpressive, without majesty.
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15922
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1983 Taylor

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Mid-red, mature and about 55% opque. Gentle nutmeg on a stewed raisin fruit. Soft brown sugar, a touch of fruit on the palate but an unexpected harshness to the core. The harshness and woody element runs through to the aftertaste and still some tannins show up. Despite the tannins, this bottle is rather light-weight and thin. 83/100.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
Post Reply