1935 Cockburn

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24402
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

1935 Cockburn

Post by jdaw1 »

On Thursday 19th December 2013 a subset of the obvious suspects gathered at The Bell in Wendens Ambo to taste old, peculiar and unknown bottles.

Links:
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15678
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1935 Cockburn

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Dark amber colour, light orange rim. Bottle stink dominates the nose. Gentle treacle and orange on the palate; coffee and Bourbon biscuits. Soft milk chocolate and caramel on the finish. Very evolved, but very enjoyable. From a bottle that was decanted in the 1960s, but was not consumed at the time and was rebottled. 86/100
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
User avatar
RAYC
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2090
Joined: 22:50 Tue 04 May 2010
Location: London

Re: 1935 Cockburn

Post by RAYC »

My notes say "oxidised" and the nose was not particularly clean, but from memory this was not entirely without merit with nice tertiary characteristics. No rating given.
Rob C.
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24402
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1935 Cockburn

Post by jdaw1 »

Brown, 30% opaque. Nose stinky. Palate “awful”.
Post Reply