
link to story
My 1 second reaction was "thick white on top, nothing wrong". I then looked closer.jdaw1 wrote:Despite being a shambles, it can be construed as being the correct way up.
Not the sharpest knives in the drawer.
The BBC wrote:BBC house style on union jack
Union jack, lower case, is the term we use for the UK flag formed by combining the crosses of St George, St Andrew and St Patrick. (The proper term, "union flag", carries potential for confusion - especially in the context of EU stories). However, where there are local political sensitivities, as in Northern Ireland, union flag is acceptable.
Indeed, what a childish dog’s breakfast.djewesbury wrote:This strange article includes the following interesting snippet
And some of them appear to have been adults!jdaw1 wrote:Indeed, what a childish dog’s breakfast.djewesbury wrote:This strange article includes the following interesting snippet
Careful - you'll have the artists' guild round with the hammers. Next thing you know, you'll be making derogatory comments about the installation I saw in a modern art museum in Cologne recently comprising a wire stretched half-way across the room - "initially mistakable for a barrier preventing the viewer from reaching an item which has been temporarily removed, the participant then begins to consider the concept of the inaccessible space" - or some-such on the adjoining notice...djewesbury wrote:And some of them appear to have been adults!jdaw1 wrote:Indeed, what a childish dog’s breakfast.djewesbury wrote:This strange article includes the following interesting snippet
There are pretentious artists, and then there strange frustrated people who shouldn't be allowed access to photoshop. The first group makes me mad, the second brings a strange delight.PhilW wrote:Careful - you'll have the artists' guild round with the hammers. Next thing you know, you'll be making derogatory comments about the installation I saw in a modern art museum in Cologne recently comprising a wire stretched half-way across the room - "initially mistakable for a barrier preventing the viewer from reaching an item which has been temporarily removed, the participant then begins to consider the concept of the inaccessible space" - or some-such on the adjoining notice...djewesbury wrote:And some of them appear to have been adults!jdaw1 wrote:Indeed, what a childish dog’s breakfast.djewesbury wrote:This strange article includes the following interesting snippet
well the iron bru one made me laugh!jdaw1 wrote:Indeed, what a childish dog’s breakfast.djewesbury wrote:This strange article includes the following interesting snippet
Agreed, but only one pertinent to this thread. I am trying to ignore the others.LGTrotter wrote:A problem? There are many, many layers of problem.
Not upside down, but it seems that the Bulgarians are mangling this country even before arriving.The Daily Mail, in an article entitled [url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2531440/Sold-Flights-buses-Romanians-Bulgarians-head-UK.html]Sold out! Flights and buses full as Romanians and Bulgarians head for the UK[/url], wrote:
All tickets for seats on buses leaving the Bulgarian capital of Sofia until January 9 have been snapped up
And Ulster in Scotland. Is this a predictive map of the British Isles post referendum?DRT wrote:It is also interesting that Dumfries and Galloway now appears to be in England
The very beautiful Inishowen peninsula. And if the Foyle (river and lough) is the boundary between North and South / Co. Derry and Co. Donegal, then Derry city is on the 'wrong' side of the river.RAYC wrote:I don't think i'd realised before that the northernmost point in Ireland (the island) was in Ireland (the country) rather than Northern Ireland. So the map was not without merit for my education!
That almost looks deliberate, since they alternate.DRT wrote:27 minutes into the first episode of Britain's Great War!
So it is trailing ahead of the pole as the lorry drives forward? I suppose it works if we pretend that the lorry is reversing very very fast.flash_uk wrote:I suspect Julian has critiqued more Union Jack hoists than I have, but what is it that is wrong with the top one? If one assumes that it is hoisted on the right (where the vertical exhaust pipe could be construed as a flagpole), then isn't it OK?
Well in that case the other side is wrong.jdaw1 wrote:So it is trailing ahead of the pole as the lorry drives forward? I suppose it works if we pretend that the lorry is reversing very very fast.flash_uk wrote:I suspect Julian has critiqued more Union Jack hoists than I have, but what is it that is wrong with the top one? If one assumes that it is hoisted on the right (where the vertical exhaust pipe could be construed as a flagpole), then isn't it OK?
That’s a no.
If at the back, the flag would flutter backwards, away from the cab.flash_uk wrote:If at the back then both sides are correct.
Oh right, yes. It took me a second to figure out why, but once I pictured it as a US flag it was blatantly obvious. It isn't just the flow of the flag that matters, but also which side the (implied) flagpole is on.flash_uk wrote:It all depends on where you consider the "flagpole" to be. If it is at the front of the cab, then both sides are wrong. If at the back then both sides are correct.
Depends which way the truck is moving. But assuming your proposition that the truck is moving forward and thus the flags are hung from the front of the cab, then both pictures show a flag hung incorrectly. The top picture cannot be "wrong" and the bottom picture be "right".jdaw1 wrote:If at the back, the flag would flutter backwards, away from the cab.flash_uk wrote:If at the back then both sides are correct.
It would, however, ruin this thread.PopulusTremula wrote:Would the issue go away if Scotland were to secede from the Union, i.e. would the flag become fool proof? If so, we may just have stumbled on the only instantly verifiable argument in favour of secession.
Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk
I'm sure other bugbears could be found to bring excitement into our lives...mpij wrote:It would, however, ruin this thread.PopulusTremula wrote:Would the issue go away if Scotland were to secede from the Union, i.e. would the flag become fool proof? If so, we may just have stumbled on the only instantly verifiable argument in favour of secession.
Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk
Indeed. But I think it is now a very real danger. I had dinner this evening with a fellow Scot who has been fiercely in the "No" camp until now. He, who unlike me has a vote, has now switched to "Yes" on the grounds that no one bothered to make a decent argument for "No". He will not be alone.mpij wrote:It would, however, ruin this thread.PopulusTremula wrote:Would the issue go away if Scotland were to secede from the Union, i.e. would the flag become fool proof? If so, we may just have stumbled on the only instantly verifiable argument in favour of secession.
It has been said before. My mother's neighbour was convinced I had a leaning to the Priesthood.djewesbury wrote:Christ Derek
No.DRT wrote:It has been said before. My mother's neighbour was convinced I had a leaning to the Priesthood.djewesbury wrote:Christ Derek
But I am now seriously worried that this could all go horribly wrong.
OK, so you, me, Owen and AHB have read JDAW's article. Something to bear in mind is that more than 50% of Scottish voters are either in the public sector or old. That doesn't represent good odds for rational thought. {controversial card played}djewesbury wrote:JDAW's excellent article on Scotland after the Pound has been doing the rounds of everyone I know.
DRT wrote:+1DRT wrote:+1DRT wrote:+1DRT wrote:+1djewesbury wrote:In that case, they should definitely, unquestionably vote no, and forestall Salmond's race to the bottom (with concrete boots, and their pensions in his pockets).
Wow, maybe it's because I've been sitting at my computer all day, and I'm sitting here listening to Gene Clark, but that's like, really trippy man…DRT wrote:DRT wrote:+1DRT wrote:+1DRT wrote:+1DRT wrote:+1djewesbury wrote:In that case, they should definitely, unquestionably vote no, and forestall Salmond's race to the bottom (with concrete boots, and their pensions in his pockets).
No.DRT wrote:In case it isn't clear, I hate Alex Salamander in the same way as the mythical version of William Wallace hated Edward Longshanks. Hate is a strong word, and one that my mother told me I should never use against anything or anyone apart from 'long-tails" (rats). Salamungo is the worst of the worst of the worst. Worse than a long-tail.
Are we off topic yet?