White paint (or the absence thereof)

Anything to do with Port.
Post Reply
idj123
Martinez 1985
Posts: 1280
Joined: 19:54 Tue 13 Nov 2012

White paint (or the absence thereof)

Post by idj123 »

Probably a rudimentary question, but does the absence of the white splash of paint (after the labels have long since since fallen away) rule out the possibility of the bottle contents being VP or is the use of white paint not necessarily universal in the Industry (and it's on a bottle by bottle basis)?
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8166
Joined: 19:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

White paint (or the absence thereof)

Post by djewesbury »

In my experience it's not by any means universal. But let's await word from the Gods. Someone here has probably written a chapter on which type of whitewash was favoured by which shippers and importers, and how chemical analysis of the splash can help to identify unlabelled bottles. :lol:
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
Andy Velebil
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3095
Joined: 21:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
Contact:

Re: White paint (or the absence thereof)

Post by Andy Velebil »

The splash of paint was not universally used. Some producers did it, some did not. Some did, then stopped, then did again. Some did for certain brands in their portfolio and not for others (or did a different type of splash for each brand).

Very few are still doing it due to the labor cost. And, IMO, it really means nothings in the scheme of things as the sediment doesn't really care what part of the inside of the bottle it sits on.

Most negotiant bottles I've seen, bottled outside of Porto, did not apply the splash.
User avatar
uncle tom
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3563
Joined: 22:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Re: White paint (or the absence thereof)

Post by uncle tom »

It's usage was common, but not universal. Sometimes it was done with paint proper, but as often with limewash, which was sometimes cleaned off when the bottles were removed from their bins and labelled.

It's presence does confirm that the bottle was intended to be laid down, which can be useful when looking at old unknown bottles as I did today - a bottle with pre-war glass and old foil capsule, and a handwritten label that said 'Coronation port, 1936, bottled 1935' Given the colour of the wine, and the paint splash, I guessed that this was probably not a tawny.

Given the excellent level and condition of the bottle, I thought it £90 well spent..
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15786
Joined: 22:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: White paint (or the absence thereof)

Post by DRT »

uncle tom wrote:a bottle with pre-war glass and old foil capsule, and a handwritten label that said 'Coronation port, 1936, bottled 1935' Given the colour of the wine, and the paint splash, I guessed that this was probably not a tawny.
Hmmm? I don't think the white splash was not the biggest clue on this bottle :roll:
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15786
Joined: 22:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: White paint (or the absence thereof)

Post by DRT »

The white splash was not really a shipper trick, it was a bottler trick, the vast majority of which happened in England.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
AW77
Morgan 1991
Posts: 1113
Joined: 19:20 Wed 25 Sep 2013
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: White paint (or the absence thereof)

Post by AW77 »

uncle tom wrote: a bottle with pre-war glass
What's the difference between pre-war and today's glass? Was the glass thinner back then?
The Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt know thy Port
User avatar
DRT
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15786
Joined: 22:51 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Contact:

Re: White paint (or the absence thereof)

Post by DRT »

AW77 wrote:
uncle tom wrote: a bottle with pre-war glass
What's the difference between pre-war and today's glass? Was the glass thinner back then?
Pre-war glass is older :wink:
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
User avatar
AW77
Morgan 1991
Posts: 1113
Joined: 19:20 Wed 25 Sep 2013
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: White paint (or the absence thereof)

Post by AW77 »

DRT wrote:Pre-war glass is older :wink:
You don't say! :)
The Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt know thy Port
User avatar
uncle tom
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3563
Joined: 22:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Re: White paint (or the absence thereof)

Post by uncle tom »

What's the difference between pre-war and today's glass? Was the glass thinner back then?
Thicker actually, and quite a lot so - a full 1900's bottle weighs around 1500g, a 1960's bottle around 1375g - current one's are coming in below 1300g.

Clues can be found on punt mould marks - rare before the late sixties/early seventies. Uneven glass colour tends to pre-date 1955, two part seams that can be readily felt with the finger tend to pre-date the mid sixties, air bubbles in the glass are almost non-existant post WWII - full and even deep green glass seems to have first appeared in the mid/late sixties, prior to that, green glass was a bit washed out and uneven; visible stress marks in the glass tend to predate the 1930's, small mouth diameters sometimes, but not always, indicate pre-WWI...
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 16:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: White paint (or the absence thereof)

Post by LGTrotter »

Go on, that '...' Indicates there may be more to come.

Are these your observations or is this also from books/web etc?
Andy Velebil
Quinta do Vesuvio 1994
Posts: 3095
Joined: 21:16 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca USA
Contact:

Re: White paint (or the absence thereof)

Post by Andy Velebil »

uncle tom wrote:
What's the difference between pre-war and today's glass? Was the glass thinner back then?
Thicker actually, and quite a lot so - a full 1900's bottle weighs around 1500g, a 1960's bottle around 1375g - current one's are coming in below 1300g.

Clues can be found on punt mould marks - rare before the late sixties/early seventies. Uneven glass colour tends to pre-date 1955, two part seams that can be readily felt with the finger tend to pre-date the mid sixties, air bubbles in the glass are almost non-existant post WWII - full and even deep green glass seems to have first appeared in the mid/late sixties, prior to that, green glass was a bit washed out and uneven; visible stress marks in the glass tend to predate the 1930's, small mouth diameters sometimes, but not always, indicate pre-WWI...
Well said!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
uncle tom
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3563
Joined: 22:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Re: White paint (or the absence thereof)

Post by uncle tom »

Are these your observations or is this also from books/web etc?
All personal observations
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
Post Reply