SL+KL: please confirm Dow + Croft.
Current draft of placemat updated. Please can:
- Derek T. to verify that these are correct;
- Somebody other than me print and bring (it’ll save me carrying them across the Atlantic).
You can easily get 12 decent tasting measures out of a bottle of port. I have a feeling a few non-66's may put is a guest appearance just to ensure a constant supply of juice isn't an issueConky wrote:Without experimenting, whats a tenth of a Port bottle?
I'd guess half a Port glass? Any advance?
I note the use of the possesive for Adam's but not for others that one might traditionally expect, specifically Graham's, Warre's and Dow's.jdaw1 wrote:My brother might be a late decision: I’ll bring the two Warres anyway.
SL+KL: please confirm Dow + Croft.
Current draft of placemat updated. Please can:
- Derek T. to verify that these are correct;
- Somebody other than me print and bring (it’ll save me carrying them across the Atlantic).
I appologise for my oversight in not correcting your error when I copied the list from a previous threadjdaw1 wrote: I note your use of possessive “Adam’s† without comment.
Sharing a bottle of port between 12 people means that each person gets about a small port glass of each bottle. By "small port glass", I mean a normal sized port glass filled to the point where the glass reaches its widest point. If we're using normal wine glasses then it will be a splash in the bottom of the glass.Conky wrote:Without experimenting, whats a tenth of a Port bottle?
I'd guess half a Port glass? Any advance?
I was thinking a Bottle each was on the sensible side, but when you consider we have a commercial environment and a 'chucking out' time, it seems quite reasonable.
Yes, we do.AHB wrote: Do we also need to book a gross of glasses?
Is that a transposition of letters, or a transposition of meanings with one meaning being “Gould Campbell†?Derek T. wrote:1966 CG's Contribution (GC)
It's incompetence. Both should read CG, being the initials of our latest addition to the attendee list.jdaw1 wrote:Is that a transposition of letters, or a transposition of meanings with one meaning being “Gould Campbell†?Derek T. wrote:1966 CG's Contribution (GC)
Seconded here. Especially as:Derek T. wrote:I vote: Ghandih Can Come
The Crusting Pipe has decent glasses for small groups but has to order in for a group as large as ours. Sadly, the glasses that they order in are only Paris goblets.jdaw1 wrote:How big are the Crusting Pipe’s glasses? Twelve on one sheet is very tight: should I split into 2Ã six?
As the statutory 12-hour deadline for objections against a seconded proposal has now passed, I can officially declare that:jdaw1 wrote:Seconded here. Especially as:Derek T. wrote:I vote: Ghandih Can Come
- he’s bringing Delaforce 1966; and
- he’s missing the 53rd CUTwC Annual Dinner the weekend before.
I have already commenced negotiations and recieved tacit approval. Will find out exact price and let you know.Derek T. wrote: I even know where you can buy a bottle of Delaforce 1966 at a very reasonable price![]()
Tell them you have been suspended from work for suspected fraud. That should seal the deal.Ghandih wrote: Now trying to persuade lawyers in Ireland they don't need my expert witnessness that evening - this could be the tricky bit.
...but what if the case involves some horrendous crime committed as part of the Tiperary Annual Tiddlywinks Festival or the question is How to make a cooked breakfast last two and half hours?Conky wrote:Working in the Legal Profession, and having had the pleasure of meeting you, I can vouch for the fact your an expert in Bugger all!!!
Told you soDerek T. wrote: The plan is that we will taste nothing but 1966's for the whole evening and probably have the most comprehensive 1966 horizontal in recent history.
No. He's not a member. Yet.jdaw1 wrote:
- CG (have I missed his TPF ID?)