???? Unknown (Bottled by DEBL of Sunderland)

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15922
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

???? Unknown (Bottled by DEBL of Sunderland)

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Unknown Shipper, Unknown Vintage
Acquired as one of a two bottle lot from Tennants auction on 26 November 2011. The two of the bottles were similar in appearance and this is the first of those two to be opened. This is a five part moulded bottle (base, cylinder, shoulders in two parts, neck) with a moulded code in the flat punt.

Described in the catalogue as "two bottles of port of unknown shipper and vintage but believed to be late 19th century". The wax seal on one bottle reads ""D.E.B.L. Sunderland"". The remnants of the wax seal on the second bottle are identical but incomplete. This bottle was leaking slightly and has been rewaxed (by me). There is no branding on the cork.

By appearance, I would estimate this bottle to be from the early 20th century.

The port was well coloured, a burnished red and about 30% opaque. On the nose it was dry and initially smelly but developed into a more attractive smell with an hour or two. Dry on the palate, with coffee, nuts and rosemary. Showing some age but also still very presentable. Pleasant palate, very hot and fiery aftertaste and finish. The presence and impact of the port was consistent with a good (if dry style of) port from one of the good vintages in the first decade of the 20th century. 85/100. Drunk 10-Dec-14. Decanted 2 hours.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
Post Reply