Re: One quiz at a time
Posted: 01:28 Sun 17 Nov 2013
"Please don't let Jimmy fix it for me", a dragon on a stick and an apple?
A place for those passionate about port, and for those new to it. We hold lots of Port tastings: please join us!
https://www.theportforum.com/
No but you are right to think it is rude, well it has a eff in it.DRT wrote:"Please don't let Jimmy fix it for me", a dragon on a stick and an apple?
So the closest I got was being rude.LGTrotter wrote:No but you are right to think it is rude, well it has a eff in it.DRT wrote:"Please don't let Jimmy fix it for me", a dragon on a stick and an apple?
I mean a persons face.
Not really in the ball park, apart from they could both be considered a snack
Now what?DRT wrote:!and I will be lenient.
Not my turn. Which is good for both of us.LGTrotter wrote:Need another clue? The snack/foodstuff is a weak point. It will yield if pushed. The caption is going to be tough. The face you might stumble across, it's a kind of archetype.
LGTrotter wrote:Now what?DRT wrote:!and I will be lenient.
DRT wrote:a persons face.
I'll be up in a minute, Dear.djewesbury wrote:Anyway, draining my glass I see it's time for bed. Good night all.
It's like a dripping tap.LGTrotter wrote:Miss you alreddy!
I like to use my language demotically. Tinkerty-tonk.DRT wrote:It's like a dripping tap.LGTrotter wrote:Miss you alreddy!
Caption: Keep calm and eff offLGTrotter wrote:One.DRT wrote:Clarification question!LGTrotter wrote:The fridge magnet question;
I have three fridge magnets, one has a caption, one has a face on a sort of peg thing, one is a plastic model foodstuff.
Name the caption, type of face or foodstuff.
Do we need three answers or one to win?
DRT wrote:Foodstuff is a leak.
Posted from Tapatalk.djewesbury wrote:DRT wrote:Foodstuff is a leak.
A valid excuse.DRT wrote:Posted from Tapatalk.djewesbury wrote:DRT wrote:Foodstuff is a leak.
My God, what a clue. 'High Windows' and chicken-licken.. I'm off to exegetise. I shall return.LGTrotter wrote:Special clue for Daniel;
Think of a hen, wandering aimlessly. Where is the hen, and how did it come to be here? Zoom in on its golden eye, and you will see Larkin;
And immediately
Rather than words comes the thought of high windows:
The sun-comprehending glass,
And beyond it, the deep blue air, that shows
Nothing, and is nowhere, and is endless.
Everybody; please ignore this.LGTrotter wrote:Special clue for Daniel;
Think of a hen, wandering aimlessly. Where is the hen, and how did it come to be here? Zoom in on its golden eye, and you will see Larkin;
And immediately
Rather than words comes the thought of high windows:
The sun-comprehending glass,
And beyond it, the deep blue air, that shows
Nothing, and is nowhere, and is endless.
By God you're right Daniel! The face does have a blue hat with golden circles on it! The rest is childs play.djewesbury wrote:My God, what a clue. 'High Windows' and chicken-licken.. I'm off to exegetise. I shall return.LGTrotter wrote:Special clue for Daniel;
Think of a hen, wandering aimlessly. Where is the hen, and how did it come to be here? Zoom in on its golden eye, and you will see Larkin;
And immediately
Rather than words comes the thought of high windows:
The sun-comprehending glass,
And beyond it, the deep blue air, that shows
Nothing, and is nowhere, and is endless.
So we have a wizard.LGTrotter wrote:By God you're right Daniel! The face does have a blue hat with golden circles on it! The rest is childs play.djewesbury wrote:My God, what a clue. 'High Windows' and chicken-licken.. I'm off to exegetise. I shall return.LGTrotter wrote:Special clue for Daniel;
Think of a hen, wandering aimlessly. Where is the hen, and how did it come to be here? Zoom in on its golden eye, and you will see Larkin;
And immediately
Rather than words comes the thought of high windows:
The sun-comprehending glass,
And beyond it, the deep blue air, that shows
Nothing, and is nowhere, and is endless.
You are a genius Daniel. Yes.djewesbury wrote:So where's my f***ing pony?
DRT wrote:Is this some sort of riddle that can only be understood by members of a secret society?
I refer the honourable gentlemen to the title of this thread.
The king of biscuits! My question will not involve numbers. It will be utterly rubbish, I promise.LGTrotter wrote:For the sake of completeness;
The face is of a clown but I would have accepted the mask of comedy as an answer. The snack is a bourbon biscuit.
I think it is the fate of the questioner to assume their question is rubbish. I always enjoy other people's questions more than my own, even those I do not understand.djewesbury wrote:The king of biscuits! My question will not involve numbers. It will be utterly rubbish, I promise.LGTrotter wrote:For the sake of completeness;
The face is of a clown but I would have accepted the mask of comedy as an answer. The snack is a bourbon biscuit.
Giuseppe Garibaldi? (I have no idea what the question is, but the clue spoke.)djewesbury wrote:The king of biscuits!
Garibaldi said death to all kings. That's why he hated the bourbons. But the houses of Savoy and Nice were left intact. Completely crackers.jdaw1 wrote:Giuseppe Garibaldi? (I have no idea what the question is, but the clue spoke.)djewesbury wrote:The king of biscuits!
Angels on horseback: no, but yum.AHB wrote:You had angels on horseback, washed down by a crisp Loire white (probably a Muscadet)
That's not how we've been playing it lately....AHB wrote:I disagree. I think if you ask a multiple question then only one part has to be answered correctly. After all, this thread is one quiz at a time, albeit I accept it is not one question at a time.
Then I decree that my oysters must be named.AHB wrote:You set the question - you set the rules for your question.
You must. That rule I did not write.AHB wrote:So I must wait for another to guess before I can do so again.
I cannot imagine how annoying and impossible it would be to get both parts right at once. My use of multi option allowed any one of the three fridge magnets unlock the next question, Thus I am now considering the best way to deal with an oyster if one were drinking a muscadet alongside it.djewesbury wrote:That's not how we've been playing it lately....AHB wrote:I disagree. I think if you ask a multiple question then only one part has to be answered correctly. After all, this thread is one quiz at a time, albeit I accept it is not one question at a time.
Grilled seems imprecise to me. There is more than one way to grill an oyster.LGTrotter wrote:I cannot imagine how annoying and impossible it would be to get both parts right at once. My use of multi option allowed any one of the three fridge magnets unlock the next question, Thus I am now considering the best way to deal with an oyster if one were drinking a muscadet alongside it.djewesbury wrote:That's not how we've been playing it lately....AHB wrote:I disagree. I think if you ask a multiple question then only one part has to be answered correctly. After all, this thread is one quiz at a time, albeit I accept it is not one question at a time.
Grilled.
Indeed; was dem einen sin Uhl, ist dem andern sin Nachtigall, as others more articulate than myself have put it.djewesbury wrote:Grilled seems imprecise to me. There is more than one way to grill an oyster.
Yes, where is André?LGTrotter wrote:Indeed; was dem einen sin Uhl, ist dem andern sin Nachtigall, as others more articulate than myself have put it.djewesbury wrote:Grilled seems imprecise to me. There is more than one way to grill an oyster.