Re: One quiz at a time
Posted: 08:36 Sun 24 Nov 2013
39
A place for those passionate about port, and for those new to it. We hold lots of Port tastings: please join us!
https://www.theportforum.com/
The closest so far, though still too high.PhilW wrote:39
I like your thinking, but I would need another full-size refrigerator to manage that order. Off-site storage in the U.S. isn't as reasonable as you have it in the U.K.djewesbury wrote:196
Do the math? Are you adressing me? (flicks imaginary speck of dust from immaculate lace cuff). I, like you I rather think, did maths.djewesbury wrote:I know Glenn bought 7 GST and is conflicted about whether he overpaid for them. And he bought the other big names too I'm sure. And 4 Capela.
Do the math.
But Glenn is American. And we should make him feel welcome here.LGTrotter wrote:Do the math? Are you adressing me? (flicks imaginary speck of dust from immaculate lace cuff). I, like you I rather think, did maths.djewesbury wrote:I know Glenn bought 7 GST and is conflicted about whether he overpaid for them. And he bought the other big names too I'm sure. And 4 Capela.
Do the math.
Good day to you sir!
3.
I am well aware of Glenn's nationality and would not address him thus, his use of 'math' would be appropriate, as would 'color' which I have used elsewhere as in; 'The color purple'.djewesbury wrote:But Glenn is American. And we should make him feel welcome here.LGTrotter wrote:Do the math? Are you adressing me? (flicks imaginary speck of dust from immaculate lace cuff). I, like you I rather think, did maths.djewesbury wrote:I know Glenn bought 7 GST and is conflicted about whether he overpaid for them. And he bought the other big names too I'm sure. And 4 Capela.
Do the math.
Good day to you sir!
3.
3 is a bad guess. Just the 4+3 I mentioned is > 3.
35
Have you ever considered achieving your aims via the under-rated art of silence?LGTrotter wrote:I am mainly trying to ensure that I don't get the next question.
Never.jdaw1 wrote:Have you ever considered achieving your aims via the under-rated art of silence?LGTrotter wrote:I am mainly trying to ensure that I don't get the next question.
8?
By whom would an 18¾cl bottle have been manufactured?jdaw1 wrote:29¼?
He owned 30 bottles. One was decanted. Three quarters of that bottle was drunk. Result: ownership of 29¼ bottles (and falling fast).djewesbury wrote:By whom would an 18¾cl bottle have been manufactured?jdaw1 wrote:29¼?
By all means pursue this line; it will be fascinating I'm sure. But given the phrasing of Glenn's question,jdaw1 wrote:He owned 30 bottles. One was decanted. Three quarters of that bottle was drunk. Result: ownership of 29¼ bottles (and falling fast).djewesbury wrote:By whom would an 18¾cl bottle have been manufactured?jdaw1 wrote:29¼?
I choose to believe that he is asking us a straightforward question about how many 2011s he has purchased. I think all available answers have already been given. We must now wait for the sun to rise over the western United States, to cast their rays over the mountains and the ocean, and for a refreshed Glenn to type in his response: "Daniel's turn."in which, let's remind ourselves, he wrote: As of this writing, how many 750 ml bottle equivalents of 2011 VP do I currently have on order or already possess?
It is certainly possible that you are correct.djewesbury wrote:I choose to believe that he is asking us a straightforward question about how many 2011s he has purchased. I think all available answers have already been given. We must now wait for the sun to rise over the western United States, to cast their rays over the mountains and the ocean, and for a refreshed Glenn to type in his response: "Daniel's turn."
Winner!PhilW wrote:31
So your Imperial is a 6 litre not a 9 litre? In fact it is a Double-Magnum, or a Bordeaux Jeroboam..?Glenn E. wrote:Winner!PhilW wrote:31
6 bottles, 3 magnums, 1 Imperial of Quevedo, 7 bottles of Stone Terraces, and 4 bottles of Capela.
Phil's turn...
Next quiz question - Daniel wants to know how big a double-magnum is.djewesbury wrote:So your Imperial is a 6 litre not a 9 litre? In fact it is a Double-Magnum, or a Bordeaux Jeroboam..?Glenn E. wrote:Winner!PhilW wrote:31
6 bottles, 3 magnums, 1 Imperial of Quevedo, 7 bottles of Stone Terraces, and 4 bottles of Capela.
Phil's turn...
If a double magnum is 6L, then a magnum must be 3L. What exactly is the complaint?AHB wrote:Daniel wants to know how big a double-magnum is.
You have missed the nature of the query. Is an Imperial 6l, or 9l? In the post linked to above, a 6l was referred to as a Methusaleh. Glenn has referred to an Imperial as a 6l. This presumably is based on what the supplier has described the bottle as to him. Is there a standard port terminology for bottles above 3l?jdaw1 wrote:If a double magnum is 6L, then a magnum must be 3L. What exactly is the complaint?AHB wrote:Daniel wants to know how big a double-magnum is.
Next Question:Glenn E. wrote:Phil's turn...
I've never seen "Imperial" used to refer to a 9-liter bottle, only a 6-liter bottle.djewesbury wrote:So your Imperial is a 6 litre not a 9 litre? In fact it is a Double-Magnum, or a Bordeaux Jeroboam..?Glenn E. wrote:Winner!PhilW wrote:31
6 bottles, 3 magnums, 1 Imperial of Quevedo, 7 bottles of Stone Terraces, and 4 bottles of Capela.
Phil's turn...
I also use that chart. But I have seen others here insist that an Imperial is 9l (or if you prefer, 9L; or perhaps, 9l).Glenn E. wrote:I've never seen "Imperial" used to refer to a 9-liter bottle, only a 6-liter bottle.djewesbury wrote:So your Imperial is a 6 litre not a 9 litre? In fact it is a Double-Magnum, or a Bordeaux Jeroboam..?Glenn E. wrote:Winner!PhilW wrote:31
6 bottles, 3 magnums, 1 Imperial of Quevedo, 7 bottles of Stone Terraces, and 4 bottles of Capela.
Phil's turn...
I just use the Wikipedia chart.
djewesbury wrote:is 9l (or if you prefer, 9L; or perhaps, 9l).
This is praise, not criticism. I tend to use the upper-case L, though not with perfect consistency.Wikipedia wrote:Originally, the only symbol for the litre was l (lowercase letter L), following the SI convention that only those unit symbols that abbreviate the name of a person start with a capital letter. In many English-speaking countries, however, the most common shape of a handwritten Arabic digit 1 is just a vertical stroke; that is, it lacks the upstroke added in many other cultures. Therefore, the digit '1' may easily be confused with the letter 'l'. Further, on some typewriters, particularly older ones, the unshifted L key had to be used to type the numeral 1. Even in some computer typefaces, the two characters are barely distinguishable. This caused some concern, especially in the medical community. As a result, L (uppercase letter L) was adopted as an alternative symbol for litre in 1979. The United States National Institute of Standards and Technology now recommends the use of the uppercase letter L,[9] a practice that is also widely followed in Canada and Australia. In these countries, the symbol L is also used with prefixes, as in mL and µL, instead of the traditional ml and µl used in Europe. In the UK and Ireland as well as the rest of Europe, lowercase l is used with prefixes, though whole litres are often written in full (so, "750 ml" on a wine bottle, but often "1 litre" on a juice carton). In 1990, the CIPM stated that it was still too early to choose a single symbol for the litre.
Prior to 1979, the symbol ℓ (script small l, U+2113), came into common use in some countries; for example, it was recommended by South African Bureau of Standards publication M33 and Canada in the 1970s. This symbol can still be encountered occasionally in some English-speaking countries, and its use is ubiquitous in Japan and South Korea. Fonts covering the CJK characters usually include not only the script small ℓ but also four precomposed characters: ㎕, ㎖, ㎗, and ㎘ (U+3395 to U+3398) for the microlitre, millilitre, decilitre, and kilolitre. Such usage in printed works is in conflict with the recommendations published by the BIPM on the advice of the major international standards organisations (including ISO, NIST, NPL, IAU, IUPAC and IUPAP) who state in the SI Brochure that unit symbols should be "printed in roman (upright) type regardless of the type used in the surrounding text".