jdaw1 wrote:Cryptographic nonsense. Attack codes at their weakest point. In this example, deducing the code is more work, and less reliable work, than guessing each possible answer. There aren’t many:And some are more likely than others.
- Adams
- Avery
- Cálem
- Cedro
- Croft
- Dalva
- Dixon
- Feist
- Judeu
- Kopke
- Krohn
- Noval
- Poças
- Roriz
- Rozès
- Sibio
- Souza
- Warre
Krohn?
The required answer is the 6-digit value that TAYLOR represents, not the missing port-house name - This does mean that once the port house is identified, the puzzle must still be solved; you are welcome to guess at 6-digit numbers, but I doubt this is the quickest route to the solution.djewesbury wrote:Warre?
Regarding your list of port houses, there is a simple realisation which will allow you to dramatically reduce that list of candidates - it is well worth re-reading Glenn's posts.