Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Organise events to meet up and drink Port.
User avatar
flash_uk
Cálem Quinta da Foz 1970
Posts: 4688
Joined: 19:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by flash_uk »

Hi folks

Next virtual tasting at the usual 7pm on Tuesday 16th June. All welcome!

People:
  1. MPM
  2. CPR
  3. SCD
  4. GEAG
  5. WHW
  6. NAC
  7. GEE
  8. JDAW
  9. TC
  10. THRA
  11. AHB
  12. BMHR
  13. RON
  14. HTWH
  15. JMK
CPR 1
Graham’s Malvedos 1996
Posts: 868
Joined: 15:18 Mon 22 Apr 2013

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by CPR 1 »

Oh go on then, yes please
User avatar
Doggett
Morgan 1991
Posts: 1203
Joined: 16:40 Sun 20 Sep 2015
Location: Weymouth
Contact:

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Doggett »

Yes please
winesecretary
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2496
Joined: 14:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by winesecretary »

Yes please. Depending on logistics, I may be a late (1930) arrival. I am trying to decide whether a VP or an older colheita should fall under the axe for the occasion.
Will W.
Taylor’s LBV
Posts: 192
Joined: 13:33 Thu 11 Aug 2016

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Will W. »

Yes, please.
User avatar
nac
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2326
Joined: 13:21 Fri 16 Dec 2016
Location: Kent & London
Contact:

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by nac »

Please.
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4430
Joined: 21:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Glenn E. »

Yes please!
Glenn Elliott
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24679
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by jdaw1 »

Yes please. As we might be many, I suggest sighted.
forest26
Warre’s Otima 10 year old Tawny
Posts: 557
Joined: 18:32 Tue 25 Mar 2014

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by forest26 »

Yes please on this one
User avatar
uncle tom
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3559
Joined: 22:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by uncle tom »

Why not!
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Croft 1945
Posts: 16020
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Yes please.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
User avatar
benread
Niepoort 1977
Posts: 1579
Joined: 20:36 Thu 17 Apr 2008
Location: Reigate, Surrey
Contact:

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by benread »

Please may I join you too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Ben
-------
Vintage 1970 and now proud owner of my first ever 'half-century'!
User avatar
flash_uk
Cálem Quinta da Foz 1970
Posts: 4688
Joined: 19:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by flash_uk »

uncle tom wrote: 16:14 Tue 09 Jun 2020Why not!
Welcome Tom! We were wondering where you had been :-)
User avatar
nac
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2326
Joined: 13:21 Fri 16 Dec 2016
Location: Kent & London
Contact:

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by nac »

Just noticed that Tuesday 16th was meant to be the date of the Warre 350 tasting. As such, will open something starting with a W.

Theme?
User avatar
flash_uk
Cálem Quinta da Foz 1970
Posts: 4688
Joined: 19:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by flash_uk »

nac wrote: 08:28 Wed 10 Jun 2020 Just noticed that Tuesday 16th was meant to be the date of the Warre 350 tasting. As such, will open something starting with a W.

Theme?
The theme is therefore something beginning with "W"
User avatar
rich_n
Graham’s Malvedos 1996
Posts: 767
Joined: 09:59 Thu 23 May 2019

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by rich_n »

I would love to join this one, I have a choice of the Sandeman or Warre LBV which might be a tough one...
User avatar
hadge
Graham’s The Tawny
Posts: 459
Joined: 19:08 Thu 17 May 2018
Location: London

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by hadge »

Yes! i'm finally free, please can i join? thanks
winesecretary
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2496
Joined: 14:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by winesecretary »

Warre 1970 (i.e. tercentenary vintage) for me then. A wine I first had with a wine buff classics master at the school wine society in early 1991. It was the star of that evening, at the beginning of its drinking window, but rich and warm. The classics master had obtained it from the choirmaster, who had won a case of it from the headmaster, in a bet that the choirmaster couldn't work the choir (of which I was a member) up to sing a particularly difficult Bach anthem. They were simpler times...
Justin K
Warre’s Traditional LBV
Posts: 356
Joined: 18:19 Mon 15 Dec 2008

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Justin K »

Looking forward to it.
User avatar
nac
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2326
Joined: 13:21 Fri 16 Dec 2016
Location: Kent & London
Contact:

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by nac »

winesecretary wrote: 20:29 Wed 10 Jun 2020 Warre 1970 (i.e. tercentenary vintage) for me then. A wine I first had with a wine buff classics master at the school wine society in early 1991. It was the star of that evening, at the beginning of its drinking window, but rich and warm. The classics master had obtained it from the choirmaster, who had won a case of it from the headmaster, in a bet that the choirmaster couldn't work the choir (of which I was a member) up to sing a particularly difficult Bach anthem. They were simpler times...
Was considering a 1997 but now thinking about a 1970.

[thinks for <5 seconds]

1970.
User avatar
uncle tom
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3559
Joined: 22:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by uncle tom »

Think I'll probably pop a W58
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4430
Joined: 21:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Glenn E. »

I may have to get creative. I generally don't like Warre's style, so have none on hand except for a 1964 Grande Reserve that's... reserved... for a later date. Oh, and a 1937 Grande Reserve that should be shared with multiple people in person because it's fabulous.

There's a decent chance that I have something bottled by Whitwham's, but finding it would require look at each bottle in turn by hand.

Last resort: Whatever looks tasty on Tuesday morning.
Glenn Elliott
Will W.
Taylor’s LBV
Posts: 192
Joined: 13:33 Thu 11 Aug 2016

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Will W. »

Glenn E. wrote: 21:35 Thu 11 Jun 2020 I may have to get creative. I generally don't like Warre's style
Mr Tawny - I have a solution: drink a Maynard's whilst standing on your head.
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24679
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by jdaw1 »

Glenn E. wrote: 21:35 Thu 11 Jun 2020I may have to get creative. I generally don't like Warre's style,
Does not compute. Warre is excellent and under-rated. Even by those who rate it ‘excellent’.
User avatar
uncle tom
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3559
Joined: 22:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by uncle tom »

I may have to get creative. I generally don't like Warre's style, so have none on hand except for a 1964 Grande Reserve that's... reserved... for a later date. Oh, and a 1937 Grande Reserve that should be shared with multiple people in person because it's fabulous.

There's a decent chance that I have something bottled by Whitwham's, but finding it would require look at each bottle in turn by hand.

Last resort: Whatever looks tasty on Tuesday morning.
Bear in mind that any White port would qualify, as would anything bottled or branded by the Wine Society..
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Croft 1945
Posts: 16020
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Or any Wine that happens to be Port.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4430
Joined: 21:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Glenn E. »

uncle tom wrote: 05:57 Fri 12 Jun 2020 White port would qualify
An excellent point! There now appears to be a light at the end of the tunnel, as I now only need to choose a bottle from my supply of Brancos.
jdaw1 wrote:Does not compute. Warre is excellent and under-rated. Even by those who rate it ‘excellent’.
Care for some brown sticky stuff? :wink:
Glenn Elliott
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24679
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by jdaw1 »

Glenn E. wrote: 22:52 Sat 13 Jun 2020
jdaw1 wrote:Does not compute. Warre is excellent and under-rated. Even by those who rate it ‘excellent’.
Care for some brown sticky stuff? :wink:
Sure, brown sticky can be good. Indeed, very good. Ditto Warre.
User avatar
rich_n
Graham’s Malvedos 1996
Posts: 767
Joined: 09:59 Thu 23 May 2019

Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by rich_n »

Does anyone else have plans to drink either the Warre 2007 LBV or the Sandeman 2015 LBV? I was frustrated that I didn’t manage to get either before the last virtual tasting and suspect those who wished to taste together did so then.
winesecretary
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2496
Joined: 14:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by winesecretary »

@rich_n - please do drink the Warre 2007 LBV and post a new tasting note [Constandia added a tasting note on 20 May 2020 to the one I wrote on 17 November 2019. Hers needs to be split off from mine into a separate tasting note. Not just because it was a different bottle but also because it sounds as though her bottle was very different from mine. Mine was rubbish. Hers sounds as if it was rather better. And, where there is divergence, more notes are particularly desirable.]
User avatar
rich_n
Graham’s Malvedos 1996
Posts: 767
Joined: 09:59 Thu 23 May 2019

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by rich_n »

winesecretary wrote: 15:14 Mon 15 Jun 2020 @rich_n - please do drink the Warre 2007 LBV and post a new tasting note [Constandia added a tasting note on 20 May 2020 to the one I wrote on 17 November 2019. Hers needs to be split off from mine into a separate tasting note. Not just because it was a different bottle but also because it sounds as though her bottle was very different from mine. Mine was rubbish. Hers sounds as if it was rather better. And, where there is divergence, more notes are particularly desirable.]
Thanks for the suggestion, I was leaning away from trying it now because I thought it might benefit from longer in the bottle but it does make sense to see if there's more of a consensus one way or the other. I do have a vague memory that Julian (maybe?) was unimpressed by the 2007 LBV compared to the 2004, which was why I was on the fence about opening it yet. I guess if it's good I can always buy more!
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Croft 1945
Posts: 16020
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Just out of interest, and a topic we could discuss tomorrow perhaps, but would anyone be interested in a blind tasting when we have our next Zoom tasting in about 2 weeks?

If people are interested and willing to cover the postage costs (of about £5 per person in the UK and who knows outside the UK) I’m willing to decant one of my bottles into sample bottles and post them out a few days before the next tasting.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
User avatar
Doggett
Morgan 1991
Posts: 1203
Joined: 16:40 Sun 20 Sep 2015
Location: Weymouth
Contact:

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Doggett »

AHB wrote: 21:59 Mon 15 Jun 2020 Just out of interest, and a topic we could discuss tomorrow perhaps, but would anyone be interested in a blind tasting when we have our next Zoom tasting in about 2 weeks?

If people are interested and willing to cover the postage costs (of about £5 per person in the UK and who knows outside the UK) I’m willing to decant one of my bottles into sample bottles and post them out a few days before the next tasting.
A very generous offer that has me saying yes please, let me know the costs and how to pay. My guess is blind before tasting and is NN63! 🍷
User avatar
rich_n
Graham’s Malvedos 1996
Posts: 767
Joined: 09:59 Thu 23 May 2019

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by rich_n »

AHB wrote:Just out of interest, and a topic we could discuss tomorrow perhaps, but would anyone be interested in a blind tasting when we have our next Zoom tasting in about 2 weeks?

If people are interested and willing to cover the postage costs (of about £5 per person in the UK and who knows outside the UK) I’m willing to decant one of my bottles into sample bottles and post them out a few days before the next tasting.
I would definitely be interested in this!
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Croft 1945
Posts: 16020
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

I don’t think I would be able to stretch to a bottle of NN63, more likely to be something either mainstream or “interesting”.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
User avatar
flash_uk
Cálem Quinta da Foz 1970
Posts: 4688
Joined: 19:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by flash_uk »

Should I open Warre ‘70 or Warre Cavadinha’82 for this tasting. Thoughts before 0700 tomorrow please!
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4430
Joined: 21:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Glenn E. »

flash_uk wrote: 22:11 Mon 15 Jun 2020 Should I open Warre ‘70 or Warre Cavadinha’82 for this tasting. Thoughts before 0700 tomorrow please!
I vote Warre '70 since I was recently served one blind and would like to see if the bottle I tasted was representative.

(I make no comment on the quality of the one I tasted so as not to prejudice your impression if you choose to open yours.)
Glenn Elliott
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4430
Joined: 21:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Glenn E. »

AHB wrote: 21:59 Mon 15 Jun 2020 Just out of interest, and a topic we could discuss tomorrow perhaps, but would anyone be interested in a blind tasting when we have our next Zoom tasting in about 2 weeks?

If people are interested and willing to cover the postage costs (of about £5 per person in the UK and who knows outside the UK) I’m willing to decant one of my bottles into sample bottles and post them out a few days before the next tasting.
I suspect that postage to Seattle would be prohibitive, but would enjoy watching everyone else participate in something similar to what I did with the Stone Terraces tasting for the Sammamish Port Club.
Glenn Elliott
winesecretary
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2496
Joined: 14:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by winesecretary »

@ flash_uk - I also support Warre '70 - join Neil and me in so doing!
CPR 1
Graham’s Malvedos 1996
Posts: 868
Joined: 15:18 Mon 22 Apr 2013

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by CPR 1 »

Well I will be opening a W70 thus go for it - we can compare bottles!
User avatar
flash_uk
Cálem Quinta da Foz 1970
Posts: 4688
Joined: 19:02 Thu 13 Feb 2014
Location: London

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by flash_uk »

Warre ’70 duly double decanted at 0700, many thanks for the guidance! Colour as expected for a ’70, nose of fruit - all seems well.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Croft 1945
Posts: 16020
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Glenn E. wrote: 22:22 Mon 15 Jun 2020I suspect that postage to Seattle would be prohibitive, but would enjoy watching everyone else participate in something similar to what I did with the Stone Terraces tasting for the Sammamish Port Club.
From a quick look at the Royal Mail website it looks like it would cost a little under $10 for a sample bottle to go through the post with delivery target being 6-7 days. I'm happy to give it a try if you'd like to!
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Croft 1945
Posts: 16020
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

I have a Weak bottle which is leaking. I will be opening that shortly for tonight's tasting. I presume this meets the required theme.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
User avatar
nac
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2326
Joined: 13:21 Fri 16 Dec 2016
Location: Kent & London
Contact:

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by nac »

AHB wrote: 21:59 Mon 15 Jun 2020 Just out of interest, and a topic we could discuss tomorrow perhaps, but would anyone be interested in a blind tasting when we have our next Zoom tasting in about 2 weeks?

If people are interested and willing to cover the postage costs (of about £5 per person in the UK and who knows outside the UK) I’m willing to decant one of my bottles into sample bottles and post them out a few days before the next tasting.
Good idea. Yes please.
User avatar
nac
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2326
Joined: 13:21 Fri 16 Dec 2016
Location: Kent & London
Contact:

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by nac »

flash_uk wrote: 06:22 Tue 16 Jun 2020 Warre ’70 duly double decanted at 0700, many thanks for the guidance! Colour as expected for a ’70, nose of fruit - all seems well.
Will be decanting my W70 “Private Cellar” Release middayish. Can’t risk doing it any earlier due to potential evaporation issues.
User avatar
uncle tom
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3559
Joined: 22:43 Wed 20 Jun 2007
Location: Near Saffron Walden, England

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by uncle tom »

It is June 16th, it is 7pm - I've not done one of these before - where is the action?
I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I shall be sober and you will still be ugly - W.S. Churchill
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4430
Joined: 21:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Glenn E. »

I'm online waiting for the host to start the meeting!
Glenn Elliott
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4430
Joined: 21:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Glenn E. »

AHB wrote: 08:07 Tue 16 Jun 2020
Glenn E. wrote: 22:22 Mon 15 Jun 2020I suspect that postage to Seattle would be prohibitive, but would enjoy watching everyone else participate in something similar to what I did with the Stone Terraces tasting for the Sammamish Port Club.
From a quick look at the Royal Mail website it looks like it would cost a little under $10 for a sample bottle to go through the post with delivery target being 6-7 days. I'm happy to give it a try if you'd like to!
That's cheap enough to be worth a try! Though I would prefer to work out an alternate payment plan with you, as wiring $10 to your account would cost me an additional $35 in wire fees thanks to our lovely antiquated banking system in the US.

Do you still have my address? If not I will email it to you.
Glenn Elliott
User avatar
rich_n
Graham’s Malvedos 1996
Posts: 767
Joined: 09:59 Thu 23 May 2019

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by rich_n »

uncle tom wrote:It is June 16th, it is 7pm - I've not done one of these before - where is the action?
Did you get an email from Mike with a link to join the online call?
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Croft 1945
Posts: 16020
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Virtual Tasting #7, Tuesday 16 June 2020

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Glenn E. wrote: 18:13 Tue 16 Jun 2020
AHB wrote: 08:07 Tue 16 Jun 2020
Glenn E. wrote: 22:22 Mon 15 Jun 2020I suspect that postage to Seattle would be prohibitive, but would enjoy watching everyone else participate in something similar to what I did with the Stone Terraces tasting for the Sammamish Port Club.
From a quick look at the Royal Mail website it looks like it would cost a little under $10 for a sample bottle to go through the post with delivery target being 6-7 days. I'm happy to give it a try if you'd like to!
That's cheap enough to be worth a try! Though I would prefer to work out an alternate payment plan with you, as wiring $10 to your account would cost me an additional $35 in wire fees thanks to our lovely antiquated banking system in the US.

Do you still have my address? If not I will email it to you.
I probably have it somewhere, but mail it through to me anyway.

Alternative payment plan will be entirely possible - could even be cash when we next meet.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
Post Reply