ThePortForum.com

Following on from some of the comments here I have created this separate Poll to gauge opinion as to whether or not the Declarations list should contain scores from Parker and Suckling. I am happy to go with the majority and, after reading the opinions offered so far, am now of the view that we should bin them.

My choice, subsequently discovered to match that of Derek T., was “Remove the scores and find a way of attaching those of TPFites†, even though previous usage has been “TPFers†.

I might be able to make the PDF link to TNs on TPF: would that do the job?

That would be good, but I am now wondering if it is necessary to use PDF if we don't need a tabular layout.

Perhaps each wine in the list could be preceeded by an Emoticon:

= a TPFburger TN exists
= no TPFburger TN exists

Where appropriate, the emoticon or the shippers name could be a link to the relevant TN.

Derek

I've voted for removing the scores and leaving just a list. I like the list being there, it's useful, but the scores are subjective.

Just the facts ma'am, just the facts.

Can we compromise on TPFoliters?

I dont trust single scores as well, but the more scores there are the better the picture. In the Bordeaux region it was always worthy to taste a wine that has been scored well from Broadbent, Parker and Gabriel.

So I would suggest we add more scores from trusty guys.

Axel

It seems that TPF is going to have ≥2 databases of house names. To allow linkage of these, the names should match. Please see thread entitled Standardised House Names. (If you don’t speak, I get to choose.)

I've just voted but don't propose to repeat my arguments as to why I would like to see the Broadbent / Suckling scores removed and replaced with TPF-ing scores.

If you really want to, you can read it here

Alex

Likewise, I will not repeat my response as to why TPFoditers scores are more likely to appear in the output than those of other sources.

Derek