Should Douro Moscatel be included in the Port TNs?

Make suggestions and report problems.
Post Reply
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Croft 1945
Posts: 16017
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Should Douro Moscatel be included in the Port TNs?

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

IVDP regulations permit two types of fortified wine to be made in the Douro. One is Port, the other is fortified Moscatel.

Slightly confusingly, moscatel grapes are permitted to be used in making white Port. But that’s a conversation for another day.


I was looking through the Port TN index and noticed there’s one reference to a Douro Moscatel.

Should we include Douro Moscatels in the Port TNs and therefore in the Port TN index or should I move this note to the “Other Fortified Wines” section? Thoughts and comments please?
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
Glenn E.
Graham’s 1977
Posts: 4429
Joined: 21:27 Wed 09 Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Re: Should Douro Moscatel be included in the Port TNs?

Post by Glenn E. »

The Moscatels from JMdF (which are Setubal, not Douro) are difficult to distinguish from good white Ports. If Douro versions are as good*, then I have no problem with them being kept with the Port TN index.

* doubtful. It is unfair to compare them to JMdF.
Glenn Elliott
winesecretary
Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
Posts: 2496
Joined: 14:35 Mon 13 May 2019

Re: Should Douro Moscatel be included in the Port TNs?

Post by winesecretary »

I would place it in the OFWs section.
M.Charlton
Warre’s Traditional LBV
Posts: 315
Joined: 15:40 Sat 23 Jun 2018

Re: Should Douro Moscatel be included in the Port TNs?

Post by M.Charlton »

winesecretary wrote: 21:56 Thu 04 Sep 2025 I would place it in the OFWs section.
Agree.
PhilW
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3709
Joined: 13:22 Wed 15 Dec 2010
Location: Near Cambridge, UK

Re: Should Douro Moscatel be included in the Port TNs?

Post by PhilW »

Agree with OFW.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Croft 1945
Posts: 16017
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Should Douro Moscatel be included in the Port TNs?

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

OK. I'll move it across later this weekend.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
User avatar
mosesbotbol
Warre’s Otima 10 year old Tawny
Posts: 628
Joined: 18:54 Wed 18 Jul 2007
Location: Boston, USA

Re: Should Douro Moscatel be included in the Port TNs?

Post by mosesbotbol »

Non-Douro Portuguese fortified wines from the mainland should be included in the port TN's, IMO.
F1 | Welsh Corgi | Did Someone Mention Port?
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Croft 1945
Posts: 16017
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Should Douro Moscatel be included in the Port TNs?

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

mosesbotbol wrote: 13:38 Fri 05 Sep 2025 Non-Douro Portuguese fortified wines from the mainland should be included in the port TN's, IMO.
When I've written a tasting note - or even a trip report - on Portuguese fortified wines from outside the Douro, I've always put them in the Other Fortified Wines forum. Things like Carcavelos, Setúbal and fortified Alicante Bouschet from the Alentejo.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
Post Reply