Whole-life Port consumption ÷ body mass

Anything to do with Port.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 25069
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Whole-life Port consumption ÷ body mass

Post by jdaw1 »

I have just made a rough-and-ready estimate of my lifetime’s consumption of Port, as a multiple of my body mass. Slightly disappointingly, it’s only 8.4×. About three-quarters of it in the last ten years.

Is drinking Port totalling eight times one’s weight a lot? It feels like a small number. Twenty would have felt like a decent job done.

Have any of us drunk more than 1 body mass of pre-WW2 Port? Not I.
User avatar
djewesbury
Graham’s 1970
Posts: 8166
Joined: 19:01 Mon 31 Dec 2012
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Whole-life Port consumption ÷ body mass

Post by djewesbury »

As you drink more port, paradoxically, the ratio may go down...
Daniel J.
Husband of a relentless former Soviet Chess Master.
delete.. delete.. *sigh*.. delete...
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 16:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: Whole-life Port consumption ÷ body mass

Post by LGTrotter »

As your body is supposed to replace all cells every seven years perhaps you should reset the calculation. Why twenty?

I sometimes like to think of my port in gallons; it can be quite daunting when you think about planning to drink forty gallons of port.
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 16:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: Whole-life Port consumption ÷ body mass

Post by LGTrotter »

jdaw1 wrote:Have any of us drunk more than 1 body mass of pre-WW2 Port? Not I.
Not even an arm's worth, more like a set of toes.
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 25069
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Whole-life Port consumption ÷ body mass

Post by jdaw1 »

LGTrotter wrote:Why twenty?
Twenty body masses feels like it fills a large lift. Or a mini-bus. Eight felt diminutive.

Maybe it was all relative to ill-judged expectation.
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 25069
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Whole-life Port consumption ÷ body mass

Post by jdaw1 »

LGTrotter wrote:I sometimes like to think of my port in gallons; it can be quite daunting when you think about planning to drink forty gallons of port.
Pre-metric the bottle size was set at the two-gallon dozen, so 1⅓ pints per bottle. Hence “forty gallons” is 20 dozen is 120 bottles. Is that a lot?
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 16:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: Whole-life Port consumption ÷ body mass

Post by LGTrotter »

jdaw1 wrote: Is that a lot?
Well, yes I think so. Particularly if I can relate it to some familiar object. A forty gallon oil drum is a really big awkward thing when it is full. And now drink it. I worry about my youthful good looks.
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 25069
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Whole-life Port consumption ÷ body mass

Post by jdaw1 »

LGTrotter wrote:I worry about my youthful good looks.
Count your blessings: you are one of the few to be so worried.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Croft 1945
Posts: 16454
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Whole-life Port consumption ÷ body mass

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

jdaw1 wrote:
LGTrotter wrote:I sometimes like to think of my port in gallons; it can be quite daunting when you think about planning to drink forty gallons of port.
Pre-metric the bottle size was set at the two-gallon dozen, so 1⅓ pints per bottle. Hence “forty gallons” is 20 dozen is 120 bottles. Is that a lot?
Have you been drinking or something?
Top 2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!

2026: DR Very Old White, Graham Stone Terraces 2011, Quevedo Branco 1986 b.2026
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 25069
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Whole-life Port consumption ÷ body mass

Post by jdaw1 »

AHB wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
LGTrotter wrote:I sometimes like to think of my port in gallons; it can be quite daunting when you think about planning to drink forty gallons of port.
Pre-metric the bottle size was set at the two-gallon dozen, so 1⅓ pints per bottle. Hence “forty gallons” is 20 dozen is 120 bottles. Is that a lot?
Have you been drinking or something?
Oh, humiliation and sackcloth and ashes and penance and self-flagellation. And the same again, twice-fold and four-fold and eight-fold.
LGTrotter
Dalva Golden White Colheita 1952
Posts: 3707
Joined: 16:45 Fri 19 Oct 2012
Location: Somerset, UK

Re: Whole-life Port consumption ÷ body mass

Post by LGTrotter »

jdaw1 wrote:
AHB wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
LGTrotter wrote:I sometimes like to think of my port in gallons; it can be quite daunting when you think about planning to drink forty gallons of port.
Pre-metric the bottle size was set at the two-gallon dozen, so 1⅓ pints per bottle. Hence “forty gallons” is 20 dozen is 120 bottles. Is that a lot?
Have you been drinking or something?
Oh, humiliation and sackcloth and ashes and penance and self-flagellation. And the same again, twice-fold and four-fold and eight-fold.
A craven withdrawal, you were of course thinking about magnums. As all right thinking port drinkers do.
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 25069
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Whole-life Port consumption ÷ body mass

Post by jdaw1 »

LGTrotter wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
AHB wrote:Have you been drinking or something?
Oh, humiliation and sackcloth and ashes and penance and self-flagellation. And the same again, twice-fold and four-fold and eight-fold.
A craven withdrawal, you were of course thinking about magnums. As all right thinking port drinkers do.
The contribution of non-standard bottle sizes was, perhaps, dominated by half-bottles of Madeira. The withdrawal was craven because the error was egregious and woefully sub-standard.
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Croft 1945
Posts: 16454
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: Whole-life Port consumption ÷ body mass

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

jdaw1 wrote:
AHB wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
LGTrotter wrote:I sometimes like to think of my port in gallons; it can be quite daunting when you think about planning to drink forty gallons of port.
Pre-metric the bottle size was set at the two-gallon dozen, so 1⅓ pints per bottle. Hence “forty gallons” is 20 dozen is 120 bottles. Is that a lot?
Have you been drinking or something?
Oh, humiliation and sackcloth and ashes and penance and self-flagellation. And the same again, twice-fold and four-fold and eight-fold.
I would worry about the accuracy of the calculation of exactly how many strokes were required to achieve eight-fold. Perhaps a calculator would help?
Top 2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!

2026: DR Very Old White, Graham Stone Terraces 2011, Quevedo Branco 1986 b.2026
User avatar
WS1
Cruz 1989
Posts: 1069
Joined: 22:08 Wed 04 Feb 2009
Location: Hertfordshire

Re: Whole-life Port consumption ÷ body mass

Post by WS1 »

AHB wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
AHB wrote:
jdaw1 wrote:
LGTrotter wrote:I sometimes like to think of my port in gallons; it can be quite daunting when you think about planning to drink forty gallons of port.
Pre-metric the bottle size was set at the two-gallon dozen, so 1⅓ pints per bottle. Hence “forty gallons” is 20 dozen is 120 bottles. Is that a lot?
Have you been drinking or something?
Oh, humiliation and sackcloth and ashes and penance and self-flagellation. And the same again, twice-fold and four-fold and eight-fold.
I would worry about the accuracy of the calculation of exactly how many strokes were required to achieve eight-fold. Perhaps a calculator would help?
I am leaving work now to head to the airport to make the Croft tasting in Germany tonight. This thread was the perfect sending off.... :lol:
"Sometimes too much to drink is barely enough"
Mark Twain
Post Reply