Hooper's 1944
Hooper's 1944
I went to check out the bottle of hooper's 1944 port today and I think the store misrepresented the bottle.
at 150$ it was priced like a VP. On inspection of the bottle it had a T stopper and it was a tawny like color. I later saw in tiny print .. "Bottled in 88".
Does anybody know if hooper's actually made a 1944 VP?
at 150$ it was priced like a VP. On inspection of the bottle it had a T stopper and it was a tawny like color. I later saw in tiny print .. "Bottled in 88".
Does anybody know if hooper's actually made a 1944 VP?
- KillerB
- Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
- Posts: 2425
- Joined: 21:09 Wed 20 Jun 2007
- Location: Sky Blue City, England
Re: Hooper's 1944
Sounds distinctly weird: 44 years to bottling would make a Colheita whince.g-man wrote:I went to check out the bottle of hooper's 1944 port today and I think the store misrepresented the bottle.
at 150$ it was priced like a VP. On inspection of the bottle it had a T stopper and it was a tawny like color. I later saw in tiny print .. "Bottled in 88".
Does anybody know if hooper's actually made a 1944 VP?
Port is basically a red drink
I was shocked at the very brown color. Was worried at first that if it was a VP .. then it clearly madierized. 150$ for madierized VP is too expensive =)Derek T. wrote:I can't find any reference to a Hooper 44 VP. Not many shippers declared that year for obvious reasons. The bottle you seen was definitely a Colheita, not a VP, but I don't think it was over-priced for a wine of that age.
Derek
But $150 for a lovely brown 66 year old Colheita isn't too badg-man wrote:I was shocked at the very brown color. Was worried at first that if it was a VP .. then it clearly madierized. 150$ for madierized VP is too expensive =)Derek T. wrote:I can't find any reference to a Hooper 44 VP. Not many shippers declared that year for obvious reasons. The bottle you seen was definitely a Colheita, not a VP, but I don't think it was over-priced for a wine of that age.
Derek

"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
- KillerB
- Taylor Quinta de Vargellas 1987
- Posts: 2425
- Joined: 21:09 Wed 20 Jun 2007
- Location: Sky Blue City, England
G-man - I think what Derek is suggesting and I just hinted is that is a:Derek T. wrote:But $150 for a lovely brown 66 year old Colheita isn't too badg-man wrote:I was shocked at the very brown color. Was worried at first that if it was a VP .. then it clearly madierized. 150$ for madierized VP is too expensive =)Derek T. wrote:I can't find any reference to a Hooper 44 VP. Not many shippers declared that year for obvious reasons. The bottle you seen was definitely a Colheita, not a VP, but I don't think it was over-priced for a wine of that age.
Derek
Colheita
that's all.
Port is basically a red drink
That is certainly what I was suggesting, and the fact that it is brown is therefore not a problem.KillerB wrote:G-man - I think what Derek is suggesting and I just hinted is that is a:Derek T. wrote:But $150 for a lovely brown 66 year old Colheita isn't too badg-man wrote:I was shocked at the very brown color. Was worried at first that if it was a VP .. then it clearly madierized. 150$ for madierized VP is too expensive =)Derek T. wrote:I can't find any reference to a Hooper 44 VP. Not many shippers declared that year for obvious reasons. The bottle you seen was definitely a Colheita, not a VP, but I don't think it was over-priced for a wine of that age.
Derek
Colheita
that's all.
g-man, I may make it to a NY Off-line one day but please don't keep this one for me. VP is my thing, not the brown stuff, even though I do enjoy it now and again.
"The first duty of Port is to be red"
Ernest H. Cockburn
Ernest H. Cockburn
-
- Taylor’s LBV
- Posts: 194
- Joined: 15:15 Fri 31 Aug 2007