1947 Smith Woodhouse

Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Forum rules
Tasting notes for individual Ports, with an index sorted by vintage and alphabetically.
Post Reply
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24398
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

1947 Smith Woodhouse

Post by jdaw1 »

Within the regulation week of DRT’s 51st birthday, we (DRT, JDAW, IDJ, AHB, THRA, SCD, CPR, ARM, and TC) brought “a bottle of VP, blind or sighted” to the Boot and Flogger.

Links:
User avatar
Alex Bridgeman
Fonseca 1966
Posts: 15677
Joined: 12:41 Mon 25 Jun 2007
Location: Berkshire, UK

Re: 1947 Smith Woodhouse

Post by Alex Bridgeman »

Believed to be 1947 Smith Woodhouse. Bottles appeared consistent with the alleged vintage but labels appeared to be in remarkably good condition for bottles stored in damp English cellars for 65 years. The cork was also consistent with the alleged vintage but was branded Smith Woodhouse Oporto and no vintage could be discerned. This particular bottle was ullaged to mid shoulde and seeping slightly..

Dark amber-brown colour, 50% opaque. Oxidised nose with toffee and a touch of VA - unpleasant. The entry is balanced by the acidity with brown sugar and balsamic vinegar and lots of heat from the brandy. Brandy dominates the aftertaste, hot and cognac-like giving a long-burn finish. This is more like a mature cognac with a touch of date essence than a mature vintage port. 78/100.
Top Ports in 2024: Niepoort 1900 Colheita, b.1971. A near perfect Port.

2025: Quevedo 1972 Colheita, b.2024. Just as good as Niepoort 1900!
User avatar
jdaw1
Dow 1896
Posts: 24398
Joined: 14:03 Thu 21 Jun 2007
Location: London
Contact:

Re: 1947 Smith Woodhouse

Post by jdaw1 »

SW47? Brown, 40% opaque. Nose stinky. Palate stinky.
Post Reply